9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of “Conspiracy Theory” – Paul Craig Roberts

global research June 20, 2011

While we were not watching, conspiracy theory has undergone Orwellian redefinition.

A “conspiracy theory” no longer means an event explained by a conspiracy.  Instead, it now means any explanation, or even a fact, that is out of step with the government’s explanation and that of its media pimps.

For example, online news broadcasts of RT have been equated with conspiracy theories by the New York Times simply because RT reports news and opinions that the New York Times does not report and the US government does not endorse.
In other words, as truth becomes uncomfortable for government and its Ministry of Propaganda, truth is redefined as conspiracy theory, by which is meant an absurd and laughable explanation that we should ignore.
When piles of carefully researched books, released government documents, and testimony of eye witnesses made it clear that Oswald was not President John F. Kennedy’s assassin, the voluminous research, government documents, and verified testimony was dismissed as “conspiracy theory.”
In other words, the truth of the event was unacceptable to the authorities and to the Ministry of Propaganda that represents the interests of authorities.
The purest example of how Americans are shielded from truth is the media’s (including many Internet sites’) response to the large number of professionals who find the official explanation of September 11, 2001, inconsistent with everything they, as experts, know about physics, chemistry, structural engineering, architecture, fires, structural damage, the piloting of airplanes, the security procedures of the United States, NORAD’s capabilities, air traffic control, airport security, and other matters.  These experts, numbering in the thousands, have been shouted down by know-nothings in the media  who brand the experts as “conspiracy theorists.”
This despite the fact that the official explanation endorsed by the official media is the most extravagant conspiracy theory in human history.
Let’s take a minute to re-acquaint ourselves with the official explanation, which is not regarded as a conspiracy theory despite the fact that it comprises an amazing conspiracy.  The official truth is that a handful of young Muslim Arabs who could not fly airplanes, mainly Saudi Arabians who came neither from Iraq nor from Afghanistan, outwitted not only the CIA and the FBI, but also all 16  US intelligence agencies and all intelligence agencies of US allies including Israel’s Mossad, which is believed to have penetrated every terrorist organization and which carries out assassinations of those whom Mossad marks as terrorists.
In addition to outwitting every intelligence agency of the United States and its allies, the handful of young Saudi Arabians outwitted the National Security Council, the State Department, NORAD, airport security four times in the same hour on the same morning,  air traffic control, caused the US Air Force to be unable to launch interceptor aircraft,  and caused three well-built steel-structured buildings, including one not hit by an airplane, to fail suddenly in a few seconds as a result of limited structural damage and small, short-lived, low-temperature fires that burned on a few floors.
The Saudi terrorists were even able to confound the laws of physics and cause WTC building seven to collapse at free fall speed for several seconds, a physical impossibility in the absence of explosives used in controlled demolition.
The story that the government and the media have told us amounts to a gigantic conspiracy, really a script for a James Bond film. Yet, anyone who doubts this improbable conspiracy theory is defined into irrelevance by the obedient media.
Anyone who believes an architect, structural engineer, or demolition expert who says that the videos show that the buildings are blowing up, not falling down, anyone who believes a Ph.D. physicist who says that the official explanation is inconsistent with known laws of physics, anyone who believes expert pilots who testify that non-pilots or poorly-qualified pilots cannot fly airplanes in such maneuvers, anyone who believes the 100 or more first responders who testify that they not only heard explosions in the towers but personally experienced explosions, anyone who believes University of Copenhagen nano-chemist Niels Harrit who reports finding unreacted nano-thermite in dust samples from the WTC towers, anyone who is convinced by experts instead of by propaganda is dismissed as a kook.
In America today, and increasingly throughout the Western world, actual facts and true explanations have been relegated to the realm of kookiness.  Only people who believe lies are socially approved and accepted as patriotic citizens.
Indeed, a writer or newscaster is not even permitted to report the findings of 9/11 skeptics.  In other words, simply to report Professor Harrit’s findings now means that you endorse them or agree with them.  Everyone in the US print and TV media knows that he/she will be instantly fired if they report Harrit’s findings, even with a laugh. Thus, although Harrit has reported his findings on European television and has lectured widely on his findings in Canadian universities, the fact that he and the international scientific research team that he led found unreacted nano-thermite in the WTC dust and have offered samples to other scientists to examine has to my knowledge never been reported in the American media.
Even Internet sites on which I am among the readers’ favorites will not allow me to report on Harrit’s findings.
As I reported earlier, I myself had experience with a Huffington Post reporter who was keen to interview a Reagan presidential appointee who was in disagreement with the Republican wars in the Middle East.  After he published the interview that I provided at his request, he was terrified to learn that I had reported findings of 9/11 investigators.  To protect his career, he quickly inserted on the online interview that my views on the Iraq and Afghanistan invasions could be dismissed as I had reported unacceptable findings about 9/11.
The unwillingness or inability to entertain any view of 9/11 different from the official view dooms to impotence many Internet sites that are opposed to the wars and to the rise of the domestic US police state.  These sites, for whatever the reasons, accept the government’s explanation of 9/11; yet, they try to oppose the  “war on terror” and the police state which are the consequences of accepting the government’s explanation. Trying to oppose the consequences of an event whose explanation you accept is an impossible task.
If you believe that America was attacked by Muslim terrorists and is susceptible to future attacks, then a “war on terror” and a domestic police state to root out terrorists become necessary to make Americans safe. The idea that a domestic police state and open-ended war might be more dangerous threats to Americans than terrorists is an impermissible thought.
A country whose population has been trained to accept the government’s word and to shun those who question it is a country without liberty in its future.
AND LEST WE FORGET….JFK’s SECRET SOCIETY SPEECH ON THE IMPORTANCE OF A FREE & INDEPENDENT PRESS.
About these ads

20 responses to “9/11 and the Orwellian Redefinition of “Conspiracy Theory” – Paul Craig Roberts

  1. I have always believed that 9/11 is the lynchpin, the one subject that will eventually bring down the forces behind the Shadow Government. I may be wrong, but it is my belief that the crime of 9/11 was so poorly executed that eventually the percentage of people needed to topple the cretins that perpetrated it will be reached as long as those of us that care keep spreading the truth.

    It’s not an easy task, but neither is accepting the lie, and indeed is far more dangerous. And In this 10th upcoming anniversary of this tragic event I believe that we need to push this issue to the forefront now more than ever. This cannot pass into history like the JFK murder, the consequences are far too dangerous.

    Too start we should be targeting the press for their failure to report the truth. The press are even more accessible than our elected officials. Boycotting their advertisers, and picketing their headquarters should be a priority. Calling them out for that cowards they are if they fail to report the truth, and civil disobedience against them should be put into action.

    What we have been doing has had some effect but it beyond time that we stepped-up our efforts and changed our tactics. The truth will not be denied. It cannot be denied.

  2. I find it interesting that a Republican Cabinet functionary has become a voice of sense in the wilderness. The impossibility of a tiger becoming a lamb forces the question of why and the answer is above. The crime was good enough, but not flawless. Therefore LIMITED HANGOUT. In regards to 9/11, it is clear to all that mere cutting charges were not key in the destrction. Nano Thermatate does not accomplish melting steel, giving off radiation, melting car doors, leaving such “hot craters.” What does? Nuclear weapons. PCR will not talk this line. No one does in the respectable truth seekers. None dare call it by name. Why? Psychology or no need to go into it or conspiracy? I say conspiracy.

    Writings of a Finnish Military Expert on 9/11. Evidence of advanced fusion devices at the WTC: 1. Pulverization of 99% of concrete into ultra fine dust as …
    verdade.no.sapo.pt/…/finnish_military_expert_hydrogen_bomb.htm –

    9/11 NUKE DEMOLITION PROOF: Firefighters Radiation Cancers “Off …
    Apr 4, 2011 … ‘9-11 Fake Video’ Stars – The JSTAR Clones http://www.rense.com/general92/911fk.htm. Why Covert Ops Must Have ‘Fake’ Video? Dr. Ed Ward, MD …
    http://www.veteranstoday.com/…/911-nuke-demolition-proof-firefighters-radiation-cancers-off-the-scale/ – Cached
    #
    REAL Truth Sites That Covered ‘Proven 9-11 Nukes’
    Sep 11, 2010 … #1: Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement By Dr. Ed Ward, MD 9-6-10. The Current Irrefutable Conclusion = Treason, Murder and Crimes …
    http://www.rense.com/general92/reald.htm – Cached – Similar

  3. Well Publius.. It’s hard enough to get the willfully ignorant to even acknowledge that their govt would lie to them and blow up buildings by controlled demolition. Try running “secret scalar” weapons past the sheeple. Good luck with that one. Having said that, I do agree that they were used along with more conventional explosives..

  4. It matters very little what sells to the public. The public is not expected to be able to handle truth. It matters very much what you sell to the intelligentsia since they pride themselves that they can. So sell inside job, sell ordinary or at least non-exotic demolition (without explaining how the stuff got wired up, transported and how long in advance–google Colin Bennet-Did A Fishmonger Do It-) and sell it most importantly as a “break” in business as usual. American history shows these psychotic actions are normative. Planned events by State actors –like Pearl Harbor-are useful to drive an agenda.

  5. I read a lot of Judy Wood’s stuff. What is her proof? I saw a little experiment her associate ran (Hutchinson effect) but that’s it. I’ve seen the pictures. I know these weapons exist but so does thermite. At least architects and engineers have proven their point even if they haven’t explained how or who planted it. Though if you watch 9/11 mysteries, they pretty much explain the how. Plus you can’t discount the multiple explosions heard on tape and by on the ground eyewitnesses. There is no dispute explosives were used also is there?

    Who are the experts behind the scalar theory that can be used to the movement’s advantage? Intelligensia? I admit I am not up on the latest progress on that front but would like to be updated if you wouldn’t mind?

    • I’m always glad to see Judy Wood mentioned. Her documentation of many Hutchinson Effect-like phenomena during and immediately following the destruction of three WTC buildings is a tremendously important contribution to explaining the means of destruction. Her reporting of the presence of the remarkably unreported Hurricane Erin off the coast of New York on 11.09.2001 is probably no less important. Yet there is also very high quality evidence of multiple explosions, cut steel structural members and other phenomena consistent with controlled demolition. There also appears to be respectable evidence of thermite, or some related preparation, having been used. The material I’ve seen suggesting that nuclear weapons were used appears to me to be speculative, but I might not have read reports dealing with the best available evidence. Each of these methods is potentially sufficient in itself to explain the WTC event.
      A competent conspirator would use all of them, and then set about forming fan clubs nominally dedicated to promulgating each individual method as the true explanation, but actually tasked with howling the others fan clubs down. And voila! The last man standing is the government’s conspiracy theory which everyone who thinks for her or himself knows can’t possibly be true.

  6. I know nothing more than anyone else who sifts the rubble. A&E has not demonstrated how their thesis relates to the evidence of steel melt for months; radiation; melt of other objects some distance from the blast; or the crater. Nor does it explain radiation sickness in First Responders. A&E refuses to look for the nuclear explanation and so they too are hirelings. I do not see the need to introduce scalar into the picture as the nuclear effect is quite sufficent. Propaganda works best on educated populations. This is of course the power of the image and imagination and a little guidance from the slogan. Limited Hang Outs are propaganda. Once you start connecting historical incidents with historical facts as a hypothesis you quickly run into propaganda cloaked as truth. Skill is required in selecting evidence and working with it to constructive a narrative out of chaos. With 9/11, as with JFK, there are always conflicting narratives. However the War Machine seems to benefit every time.

  7. http://www.antifascistencyclopedia.com/allposts/dangers-of-a-politicized-military

    Bruce Ackerman worries that American presidents have grown too powerful. Watergate, Iran-Contra, the War on Terror — they all reflect a presidency increasingly used for political extremism and lawlessness. In his new book, The Decline and Fall of the American Republic, just released by the Belknap Press Press of Harvard University Press, Ackerman points to a series of political, bureaucratic, legal, and military developments that are making the modern presidency into a far more dangerous institution than it was in the days of Watergate. Here, Ackerman, Sterling Professor of Law and Political Science at Yale, focuses on the transformation of military-civilian relationships and the need for reform.

  8. Ah where to begin. Is there one Truth Movement? Is it armed? Is it secular or dogmatic? Are there acknowledged leaders or simply respected authorities? What is the source of their authority? How does it relate to the subject at hand? Obviously the buildings came down with explosives but it does make a considerable difference if a nucelar weapons was used. It manages to make all of the evidence make more sense than simple cutting charges. Second it is fair to say A&E REFUSES to consider this option. This becomes important when you realize that professional organizations are political organizations and are bought off. Thus the split begns as always with the “EXPERTS.” That said, it is of considerable interest that only the A&E point of view is permissible. In my opinion it is far easier to deflect from the real issue by simply saying demolition. It ignores a host of questions that are more important than the actual demolition. As Colin Bennet asks, Did a Fishmonger Do It? There are unanswered questions that A&E’s thesis does not touch and so by admitting to the small truth the bigger truth of nuclear detonations is ignored. By ignoring the detonation I say they are simply formally doing their job. Kinda like climate science hiding the Medieval Warm Period in the interests of the greater good.

    • Well let’s begin with what HAS been proven. Controlled demo was used. Was it the only method? No, I personally don’t think so. But the evidence is there.

      Again I ask, where are the experts for the other theories? I’m not trying to be argumentive, I really would like to know. Other than Judy Wood and her Hutchinson effect theory, I haven’t seem much else.

      So, what do you have to offer in the way of proof as say, the A&E’s and all those credible eyewitnesses have for controlled demo?

  9. I agree rogue. Thalassarche’s answer was right on. I get really annoyed with people that try to divide the movement. Why?

    It’s obvious many methods of demo were used. Why compartmentalize us all into tiny little boxes? Nano thermite group over here….scalar weapons over here.. nukes over there and never the twain shall meet. Silly and divisive. We need to come together as a united front, not tear each other apart. Those that use that tactic to me are the agent provacateurs.

    Sounds too much like the typical NWO tactic of divide and conquer…….

  10. Again I am not posing, I am pointing my finger at the moon.

    A Brief Summary: WTC Destruction & High Temperature Aftermath: ONLY Nuclear Bombs and the China Syndrome Fit All the Evidence (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    35 Reasons for Many Small Fission Nukes at the WTC (by Spooked)

    The Crucial Differences in the Nuclear 9/11 Theories– A Call To Eliminate Nuclear 9/11 Mis- or Dis-Information & Attain Completeness and Fit all the Known Evidence (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    On the Issue of Nuclear Demolition of the WTC and Radiation (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Original WTC Nuke Thesis from “Anonymous Physicist” (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    If the WTC Nuclear Destruction Had the China Syndrome Aftermath, Why Didn’t Hiroshima? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    WTC7 Demolition: Conventional, or Nuclear After All– and the Speculative Nuclear Borer Hypothesis (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    The “China Syndrome” Came to New York City on 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Hanging Skin and Nuclear Blasts. Where in the World is Felipe David– and Did He Survive Exposure to Nuclear Radiation? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Eyewitness Testimony of Firefighters Believing They Were Nuked on 9/11 as well as early WTC7 Destruction, EMP, non-impact plane flyby, and people being pushed out of a WTC tower (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    More Evidence & Testimony Indicating Nuclear Blasts, Nuclear Radiation, & China Syndrome at the WTC (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Proof of the Existence of Mini-Nukes and Micro-Nukes (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Brief Summary of Evidence of Nuclear bombs used at the WTC on 9/11/01 (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Was the First Atomic Bomb [in modern times] Exploded on an American Town by the American Govt? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Could 9/11 Have Been Done With FAE/Thermobaric Explosives? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Breakthroughs Toward Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11– The Likelihood of Sabotaged, Fizzled Nukes (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Basement Nukes and Top-Down Demolition (by Spooked)

    Breakthrough: The Story Of Cathy T, & The Large Earthquake That Was Felt One Mile Away When WTC1 Was “Hit”! (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    More On the Immediate and Continous Radiation Lowering, and Shielding, Techniques Used at the WTC, after 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    The Final Word on The Tritium (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Exposing The “Red Mercury” Nuclear Scam, & Its Possible Use In Future Bogus Wars, & Other Crucial Matters On Nuclear 911, and About Mercury (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Breakthroughs Towards Attaining A Complete Understanding of the Nuking of the WTC on 9/11, and its China Syndrome Aftermath: Part II (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    On The Existence of Mini- or Micro-Nukes, Fizzled Nukes, 9/11 & The China Syndrome (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    A Summary of Evidence of EMPs (Electromagnetic Pulses) from the Nukes Used in the WTC on 9/11 (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    WTC Destruction Theories: “DEW” versus Thermite/Thermate/Super Thermate versus Milli-Nukes/Micro-Nukes (by Spooked)

    Ground Zero Smoking Cannon: Where Are All the Core Columns and Beams??? (by Spooked)

    Micro-Nukes in the WTC–Creating The China Syndrome: Important Matters of Completeness & Plausibility (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    Did Two Nuclear Reactors, not Nuclear Bombs, Destroy the WTC on 9/11? Review of William Tahil’s Book, “Ground Zero: The Nuclear Demolition of the WTC”, and of his Reactor Hypothesis (by The Anonymous Physicist)

    The Effect of a Low Yield Nuke on a Steel Structure (by Spooked)

    The Fall of the WTC1 Spire and the Intact WTC1 Stairwell: Proof of Demolition Near Bottom of the Tower (by Spooked)

    Further Observations on WTC1 Stairwell B– 1. Did Pasquale Buzzelli Surf Down The “Collapse”—or Do Conflicting Reports Collapse the O.C.T.? 2. Does the Revealed “Upward Wind” During “Collapse” Prove the Final “Cleaner Nuke”? (by The Anonymous Physicist)

  11. Spooked and The Anonymous Physicist don’t exactly have the same cred as over 1,200 A&E’s, Sounds like they are offering a theory that it could happen not how it did. Not the proof I am looking for.

    I’m not convinced at all by the nuke theory.

  12. Obviously the game was multiple deniability opportunities by using several teams and several techniques. Again looking at the evidence in the round why does A&E not engage this evdience but sweep it aside? Why does no comment, or refusal to comment, or ignoring the concept totally, not give one pause for thought? We live in a world of total lies, professional organizations are political organizations. My point is that the preponderence of evidence is open to examination and refutable based on the nuclear theory. That is, by including all the evidence such as melted cars and craters and radiation sickness-none that can be caused by conventional nano thermite cutting charges- we have a tragedy far beyond “false flag.”

    Ed Ward-

    Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement:
    By edwardmd
    Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement:

    The Current Irrefutable Conclusion = Treason, Murder and Crimes Against Humanity for 9-11, the Iraq War, and Revocation of Constitutional Rights of US Citizens – All US ‘representatives’ appropriate US citizens, and non citizens, need to be on trial in Constitutional Courts.

    The Current ‘Basic’ Proven 9-11 Nuke Evidence – (About 95 to 98% of the TOTAL evidence covered) – All proven basic physics/chemistry ANY high school graduate should understand after the basic courses.:

    1. Three Massive WTC Craters – See us government LIDAR proof: – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024 – NOT an endorsement of the site.

    2. Five Acres (1.2 Billion Pounds = Weight of Residue of 3 WTC Buildings (WTC 1, 2, and 6)) of WTC Land Brought to Seering Temperatures in a Few Hours by an
    ‘Anaerobic, Chlorine Fueled “Fire” – Impossible by Basic Laws of Physics. See us
    gov Thermal Images proof – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024 – NOT an endorsement of the site.

    3. Tritium Levels 55 Times (normal) Background Levels assessed a numerical value
    of ‘traces’ and ‘of no human concern’. See us government (DOE report) proof: – Nothing but a NUCLEAR EVENT can cause ‘tritium’ formation – basic physics fact – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EdWard-MD/message/141

    4. An Impossible “Fire” (Combustion Process). See Laws of Physics for
    Fire/Combustion Process and Dr. Cahill’s data on ‘anaerobic incineration’. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    rense.com/general77/newlaws.htm

    5. 3 Billion pounds of building instantly turned into 2 Billion pounds of
    micronized dust. – Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://www.serendipity.li/wot/ed_ward/use_of_abombs.htm

    6. 16 inch steel Spires that withstood 1/2 a Billion pounds of building falling
    on them and suddenly turn into limp noodles and partially vaporize. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024 – NOT an endorsement of the site.

    7. Hiroshima effect cancers in responders and locals. Nothing else known to man can leave ALL the WTC debris and this particular evidence in the length of time needed , except a third generation Micro Nuke – Mini Nuke – Nuke. It’s 100% classic textbook nuclear event residue – ZERO ANOMALIES.
    http://letsrollforums.com/update-us-government-s-t22024.html?t=22024 – NOT an endorsement of the site.

    All of the above are facts are proven with referenced links of reputable data sources – many are from the government itself and more…

    Mini Nukes Were Used on 9-11 http://www.henrymakow.com/mini-nukes_were_used_on_9-11.html

    Update: Mini Nukes at the WTC – 9-11 The Fetzer/Ward : Conversations on Mini Nukes in/on WTC/9-11 – 1 hour http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-ed-ward-md.html
    Eventually, we get to the WTC, Thermite BS – S. Jones, Micro Nukes/ Mini Nukes in the WTC, Truck Bombs – crater = mini nuke, history of mini nukes, reg demo… needed to cover for nukes & nukes to remove the demo evidence, why 5 nukes needed to fit all the evidence, ALL, 100% of the evidence = nuke; 0, NADA, NO, ANOMALIES; DEW = Wood’s BS… It’s not me, It’s physics.

    When 20 = Normal, How does 1,092 = “Traces”, Listen Do Want to Know a Secret… Listen – Cancers explained, Tritium explained – Half life = 10 days, craters explained, 1 billion pounds (coincidently the approximate mass of residue of the 3 buildings – basic physics – heat transfer and residual heat) of dirt 1800 degrees MINIMUM. the Nuke evidence – partial but still large, I apologize to Fetzer over not revealing Mini Nukes facts – still have concerns; as for our ex navy seal who more than likely had training/basics of SADM deployment, but definitely got some demo training, yet doesn’t understand the ‘science’? ;-) , Richard Gage addressed,

    CORRECTION: All Davy Crockett kilotonage quotes during the above should have been quoted as 0.018 kilotons, not .18, 18, etc – all incorrect numbers = 0.018 kilotons
    http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-ed-ward-md.html

    Setting the Record Straight on Mini Nukes in the WTC/9-11 rense.com/general91/setting.htm

    Mini Nukes Were Used on 9-11 http://www.henrymakow.com/mini-nukes_were_used_on_9-11.html

    I did a program with Bill Deagle – not online yet – about the only thing discussed that hasn’t been already been explained – ‘Swiss Cheese’ Steel = Extremely High Concentrations of Chlorine + Very High Temperatures = Classic Oxidation/Reduction Reaction = Steel undergoing MASSIVE oxidation by chlorine. wherever exposed to WTC pile atmosphere.

  13. I am not sure why Ward attacks-he is an older man and has been ignored for some time on the issue.

    As to A&E-here again, I can only say that they do have a duty to not close the case. And that to close the case indicates a reason. A reason that may be bought.

    I think the nuclear 9/11 in the round offers the highest and best explanation of the evidence. Ignoring it as A&E does indicates to my mind that the fix is in. And that is important since we happily live with a non-nuclear 9/11. It’s like FDR and Pearl Harbor in a sense (see Charles Beard on Pearl Harbor and FDR) and the public moves on. However, if you inform the public that without a doubt these explosions were ATOMIC-well I think the great revolutions of the 20th century would be a picnic next to what would happen here. As with FDR, if the public really understood that FDR did all he could to bring Japan into war-history would be different.

  14. Have Hiroshima type cancer rates risen exponentially since 9/11 in NYC? I’m not just talking about the first responders here. If so, do you have links to those studies?

    Scalar weapons could have caused the same type of damage that you’re talking about except for radiation sickness. no? I honestly hadn’t heard that until you just posted it.

    If the public as a whole still refuses to believe 9/11 was an inside job, by any means, it really doesn’t matter what brought the towers down. To them, it will always be 19 arab terrorists with boxcutters.
    In the end, that’s what we’re really left to deal with regardless of what theories we hold to be true. I honestly have given up on the willfully ignorant sheeple. They just don’t have the capacity for critical thinking.

  15. The “traces” found are challengeable as a ploy. Surely you would use other things aside from atomics, but again craters, molten steel, steel being thrown, cars melted far away, and radiation in the background far greater than normal indicate atomics. The way I frame the notion is that when the shit hit the fan I would have my team come out and say a tuth-controlled demolition, perfectly obvious and safe, and then say nano thermate-which by the way was quite new at the time and maybe even too new to be used. I tend to think of disinformation as normative. I expect 9/11 to have a considerable amount of disinformation-and sure enough we do see all kinds of sophisticated disinformation. Starting of course with the cover story. Then we ask how many operations were piggy backed on bringing down the towers? Then we can go to the meat of it which is simply Americans do not care if non-nuclear device brought down the Twin Towers.
    Once nuclear device is introduced as the primary tool, well, again, I would expect to see a revolution unlike any seen before now. Americans have psychological guilt over nuclear weapons and are horrified of radiation. Finally, I do not expect to see anything resembling legal proceedings around 9/11.

  16. I do not have any cites on radiation sickness in NYC. We simply have significantly higher than normal radiation. I do not think Scalar cd leave the craters or the radiation. The reason I think AE is owned is that they are asserting as evidence technology that cannot leave behind radiation, craters, molten metal, steel thrown, car doors melted etc. Like NIST they have an agenda. The agenda is to provide intelligent people with an explanation that they will accept. Lastly, ask this question about the sheeple: if you were told by A&E it was nuclear detonations do you not think the response would be much more galvinized than mere explosives? That is, the shock of it being nuclear would then force dots to be connected. You know another way to say this that might make sense is to simply suggest that like all hypotheses
    people hold tenaciously to a fixed opinion and defend it long after it is obviously incorrect–and science is replete with exactly this mentality.
    It is true that A&E need not be controlled, it is true that they like to hold to their opinion and not look at the evidence for atomics.

  17. The problem we face is not what physical evidence to present to the brainwashed masses to make them understand what happened on 9/11. It’s that they refuse to believe their govt could do such a thing.

    The entire body of evidence …common sense evidence.. without all the scientific mumbo jumbo about nano thermite, nukes and scalar weapons that the average person doesn’t understand anyway, points to an inside job. Yet, try to bring up all the anomalies of that day to the average prole and you’ll get either blank stares or outright anger. How dare you accuse OUR govt of killing it’s own people! If you hate our country so much, you nutty tin foil hatter, than why don’t you leave ! Yes someone actually said that to me minus the tin foil hatter reference.

    THAT is the main problem we’ve had to contend with. Not what device was used to bring the towers down and usher in the fascist police state

    Face it, we are dealing with mindless drones who don’t have a clue about what’s really going on and no desire to find out. Or in the back of their mind, they know something is very wrong but don’t want to acknowledge the truth because it’s just too damn scary to think about. Pass the prozac and hand me the remote please the ball game is on. Oh look, Justin Beiber is in town and that girl DID murder her children! THAT’s what they are into. Critical thinking doesn’t exist in their world.

    So, in the end, arguing amongst ourselves about the method isn’t going to change any of the sheeple’s minds. While interesting for us to ponder, they just don’t want to know.

  18. Pingback: "Ministry of Truth" redefines truth as conspiracy theory - Stormfront

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s