Who Precisely Is Attacking the World?

By Paul Craig Roberts
Rense.com

The stuck pigs are squealing. To shift the onus from the US State Department, Hillary Clinton paints Wikileaks’ release of the “diplomatic cables” as an “attack on the international community.” To reveal truth is equivalent in the eyes of the US government to an attack on the world.

It is Wikileaks’ fault that all those US diplomats wrote a quarter of a million undiplomatic messages about America’s allies, a.k.a., puppet states. It is also Wikileaks’ fault that a member of the US government could no longer stomach the cynical ways in which the US government manipulates foreign governments to serve, not their own people, but American interests, and delivered the incriminating evidence to Wikileaks.

The US government actually thinks that it was Wikileaks patriotic duty to return the evidence and to identify the leaker. After all, we mustn’t let the rest of the world find out what we are up to. They might stop believing our lies.

The influential German magazine, Der Spiegel, writes: “It is nothing short of a political meltdown for US foreign policy.”

This might be more a hope than a reality. The “Soviet threat” during the second half of the 20th century enabled US governments to create institutions that subordinated the interests of other countries to those of the US government. After decades of following US leadership, European “leaders” know no other way to act. Finding out that the boss badmouths and deceives them is unlikely to light a spirit of independence. At least not until America’s economic collapse becomes more noticeable.

The question is: how much will the press tell us about the documents? Spiegel itself has said that the magazine is permitting the US government to censure, at least in part, what it prints about the leaked material. Most likely, this means the public will not learn the content of the 4,330 documents that “are so explosive that they are labelled ‘NOFORN,'” meaning that foreigners, including presidents, prime ministers, and security services that share information with the CIA, are not permitted to read the documents. Possibly, also, the content of the 16,652 cables classified as “secret” will not be revealed to the public.

Most likely the press, considering their readers’ interests, will focus on gossip and the unflattering remarks Americans made about their foreign counterparts. It will be good for laughs. Also, the US government will attempt to focus the media in ways that advance US policies.

Indeed, it has already begun. On November 29, National Public Radio emphasized that the cables showed that Iran was isolated even in the Muslim world, making it easier for the Israelis and Americans to attack. The leaked cables reveal that the president of Egypt, an American puppet, hates Iran, and the Saudi Arabian government has been long urging the US government to attack Iran. In other words, Iran is so dangerous to the world that even its co-religionists want Iran wiped off the face of the earth.

NPR presented several nonobjective “Iranian experts” who denigrated Iran and its leadership and declared that the US government, by resisting its Middle Eastern allies’ calls for bombing Iran, was the moderate in the picture. The fact that President George W. Bush declared Iran to be a member of “the axis of evil” and threatened repeatedly to attack Iran, and that President Obama has continued the threats–Adm. Michael Mullen, Chairman of the US Joint Chiefs of Staff, has just reiterated that the US hasn’t taken the attack option off the table–are not regarded by American “Iran experts” as indications of anything other than American moderation.

Somehow it did not come across the NPR newscast that it is not Iran but Israel that routinely slaughters civilians in Lebanon, Gaza, and the West Bank, and that it is not Iran but the US and its NATO mercenaries who slaughter civilians in Iraq, Afghanistan, Yeman, and Pakistan.

Iran has not invaded any of its neighbors, but the Americans are invading countries half way around the globe.

The “Iranian experts” treated the Saudi and Egyptian rulers’ hatred of Iran as a vindication of the US and Israeli governments’ demonization of Iran. Not a single “Iranian expert” was capable of pointing out that the tyrants who rule Egypt and Saudi Arabia fear Iran because the Iranian government represents the interests of Muslims, and the Saudi and Egyptian governments represent the interests of the Americans.

Think what it must feel like to be a tyrant suppressing the aspirations of your own people in order to serve the hegemony of a foreign country, while a nearby Muslim government strives to protect its people’s independence from foreign hegemony.

Undoubtedly, the tyrants become very anxious. What if their oppressed subjects get ideas? Little wonder the Saudis and Egyptian rulers want the Americans to eliminate the independent-minded country that is a bad example for Egyptian and Saudi subjects.

As long as the dollar has enough value that it can be used to purchase foreign governments, information damaging to the US government is unlikely to have much affect. As Alain of Lille said a long time ago, “money is all.”

9 responses to “Who Precisely Is Attacking the World?

  1. best to keep an open mind… it kinda makes sense that he would use MSM, given the potential global consequences. maybe, too, he’s trying to stay alive and so thus offering the info to the US gov first

    who knows… we could speculate till doomsday, and so PCR is probably right – we’ll not know the full extent of the “illusions within illusions,” like you previously posted.

    but, no doubt, these data dumps are a game changer.(no matter who’s orchestrating it)

  2. I think this is a great article, and it is important to keep an open mind as Rady says. Precisely b/c it’s a game changer 100%. I pray Julian has someone watching his back. I’m all for him.

  3. well, he said that his stuff is tucked at various sites around the globe so if anything happens to him, there’ll be a massive dump. then the us government won;t be able to censor any of it.

  4. I just love the cricus atmosphere that Assange and WikiLeaks has created for our diversion…

  5. Hey ww, I don’t really care at this point whether he is a shill or for real, I think he’s worth saving, AND I LOVE the sweat pouring from all the alleged diplomats etc. It is better than I Love Lucy! 🙂 Happy Sunday, dear!

  6. ww -you ass :-)) Yea, soon we’ll be back to dixie-cups and string. Might be better, when you think of it. The information overload is also helping to bring down communities. Not that info is bad mind you, but people who can’t live without their cell phones? That is just crazier than a shit-house rat. No bagging, stamping, spraying, touching, screening, zapping, mugging etc. for this ole’ girl’s ass…I’ll go back to the stone age, thank you very much.

    BTW, I think you’re the one who thinks he’s a cutie-pie {{{hugsandlaughs}}}

  7. Oh reallllly, ww? Just what kind of cigar DO you smoke? (teehee) As for the post-industrial thing, I’ll just go ahead and plant my KMA garden next spring…and hunker down and wait. kissskisss

  8. I gave up Camels…like the new ID…make mine Bite Me 99! The cone of silence descends…..arrrrrgggghh. Yea, use the state owned ones for TP

  9. jess a jackknife haf ol Mack babe….but he keep it outtasite..hmmmhmmm, dems was da days…yea man.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s