Military officer’s 9/11 case against Bush officials to be heard April 5

Exit hole inside the third ring of the Pentagon

4/28 UPDATE: Bush court dismisses 9/11 suit against Bush officials, orders sanctions

From info provided by Center for 9/11 Justice
Edited by Rady Ananda

A Top Secret Military Specialist, who was injured in the Pentagon explosion on September 11, 2001 and who sued Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld and Air Force General Richard Myers for conspiracy, terrorism, constitutional violations, and for personal injuries, will have her case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the 2nd Circuit (Connecticut) on April 5.

April Gallop saw disturbing things up close that have not been reported in the media, advises her attorney, William Veale.  An independent judicial hearing of that and other evidence will allow review of the official explanation of the events on 9/11, which numerous experts claim to be impossible according to the laws of physics.

On March 15th, 2010, the lower court dismissed with prejudice the case of Gallop v. Cheney, et. al., ruling that the Complaint was frivolous and based on “cynical delusion and fantasy.” Judge Denny Chin refused to consider any other claims, including those backed by testimony of Transportation Secretary Norman Mineta to the 9/11 Commission about former vice president Dick Cheney’s stand down order. Gallop appealed the decision.

On the morning of September 11, 2001, she was ordered by her supervisor to go directly to work at the Pentagon, before dropping off her ten-week-old son Elisha at day care. Amazingly, the infant was given immediate security clearance upon arrival.

The instant Gallop turned on her computer an enormous explosion blew her out of her chair, knocking her momentarily unconscious.

Escaping through the hole reportedly made by Flight 77, she saw no signs of an aircraft – no seats, luggage, metal, or human remains.  Her watch (and other clocks nearby) had stopped at 9:30-9:31 a.m., seven minutes before the Pentagon was allegedly struck (at 9:38 a.m.).

The 9/11 Commission reported that “by no later than 9:18 a.m., FAA centers in Indianapolis, Cleveland, and Washington were aware that Flight 77 was missing and that two aircraft had struck the World Trade Center.”

Why then were there no anti-aircraft defenses, Gallop asks, or alarm warnings inside the Pentagon?

Gallop was briefed by officials not to tell her story in public; she also received an email from a Fox News reporter who had been told by the Pentagon not to interview her.

Gallop now believes that officials within the Bush Administration conspired to destroy the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center and WTC 7 – the third building brought down at 5:20 p.m. that day – with pre-placed explosives detonated after the planes hit.

Gallop’s case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks.  In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

In addition, Ms. Gallop will, through photographic and other physical evidence, as well as the testimony of a multitude of military and civilian survivors, demonstrate the impossibility of her having lived through the attack on the Pentagon if it had taken place as the government and the defendants claim.

A December 2010 poll conducted by the prestigious Emnid Institute, and reported in the German magazine “Welt der Wunder,” revealed that 89.5% of German respondents do not believe the official story of 9/11. German Federal Judge, Deiter Dieseroth, stated in December 2009 that:

“No independent court has applied legal procedures to review the available evidence on who was responsible for the attacks.”

The stakes in this case are epic, including the possibility of an overwhelming transformation of the world’s understanding of history, not to mention American citizens’ relationship with their government.

The case of Gallop v. Cheney, Rumsfeld, and Myers will be heard on Tuesday, April 5 at 11 a.m. at the Federal Courthouse at 141 Church Street in New Haven, Connecticut.

Documents related to the case can be found here.

Click here if you wish to support the legal efforts of this lawsuit.

Also see this 2008 interview:

37 responses to “Military officer’s 9/11 case against Bush officials to be heard April 5

  1. Pingback: Military officer’s 9/11 case against Bush officials to be heard April 5 (via COTO Report) « Freeman Walking

  2. Google search found nothing about this from the New York Times, Washington Post, or WSJ.

  3. The way almost the entire political and intellectual mainstream has succumbed to a groupthink denial of this issue is horrifying. It basically means that most ‘intellectuals’ will believe as they are told. And they don’t even have to be told, overtly.

  4. Dr. G. William Walster, Ph. D.

    This needs to go viral on the Internet.

  5. I am clapping my hands with delight!!! I hope she blows that hole right through the middle of their false flag and everything and blows the thing wide open. Amazing that the Amerikan people still go blithely on with their fantasies about their guvment being so worthy of warm fuzzies. Yech!

  6. Can anyone confirm that this is actually happening?

  7. I find it insulting that we are left to argue about details like this, and promulgate a logical theory based on scraps of evidence – all the while there exists volumes of material showing hard physical evidence – like the footage from dozens of video cameras not released, which could easily prove quite conclusively what happened. They hide behind the false pretense of protecting “national security” – what Bullshit!!!!!!

    If you showed me just one of the tapes of a plane flying into the Pentagon – guess what I would do? I’d set my body hair on fire and go running down main street flailing a chainsaw searching for a bus load of innocent children to kill along with the mayor – so you better not let me see that evidence. Perhaps it is the mass-murderers’ security that is at stake here, and not that of the nation.

    How can we attain justice from the courts, the media, the “authorities” – when these institutions themselves are corrupted endemically throughout as part of the same organism which caused this tragedy, is not ours a war economy in need of enemies? Not to say we shouldn’t try, and not to cast aspersions on the process of discovery for the truth – I’m willing to admit it is my ego which makes me sound pessimistic in this regard.

    On Dec. 19th 2001 – The NY Times printed a story of the NY Fire Dept. declaring the fires at the WTC location from the 9/11 event to be “officially” extinguished. They were still finding molten metal at 3 sites many weeks after 9/11, even though only 2 planes crashed into 2 of the 3 buildings. That’s some jet fuel huh.

    When I explain this fact to people they stare at the floor and say that they do not believe me, or tell me I’m not an engineer so I can’t understand the dynamics of such an issue.

    “Most people prefer to believe that their leaders are just and fair, even in the face of evidence to the contrary, because once a citizen acknowledges that the government under which he lives is lying and corrupt, the citizen has to choose what he or she will do about it. To take action in the face of corrupt government entails risks of harm to life and loved ones. To choose to do nothing is to surrender one’s self-image of standing for principles. Most people do not have the courage to face that choice. Hence, most propaganda is not designed to fool the critical thinker but only to give moral cowards an excuse not to think at all.” – Michael Rivero

  8. Peter – I couldn’t have said it better myself…and I’ll join you on the fateful day, although I likely have far less body hair than you! :-O

  9. Don’t bet on it, the level of follicular denigration I’ve suffered from lo these many years would propel me to the Alopecia Hall of Fame. We got off a ride at Disneyland a few days ago – the monitors showing every cart’s occupants at the end of the ride, thereby immortalizing my wife and children shrieking in horrific delight – my only question, Who’s the fat bald guy in the back?

  10. ROFLMAO….thanks for that! You’re too funny!

  11. Will the judge allow the evidence to be heard in open court, or is it going to be suppressed on national security grounds like so many others since 9-11? This will make a huge difference on how many hear anything about the proceedings

  12. boomerangcomesback

    Good comment ZaZa. Let’s hope April Gallop makes it safely to her court date.

  13. I wish her the best. I doubt it will matter. It did not matter that Christine Todd Whitman lied about air quality; it did not matter that the 9/11 Commission had evidence held back; it does not matter that tactical nuclear weapons most likely were responsible for bringing the Twin Towers to the ground in a perfect implosion or that WTC 7 unhit went down as well. It is good that a trier of fact is scheduled to hear the case, but given the obvious consequences arising from the cover-up being exposed, it is simply impossible to think a Federal judge who values his skin, or his retirement package, will let justice prevail.
    Robinson Jeffers, in his poem Casssandra, aptly phrased it-

    The mad girl with the staring eyes and long white fingers
    Hooked in the stones of the wall,
    The storm-wrack hair and screeching mouth: does it matter, Cassandra,
    Whether the people believe
    Your bitter fountain? Truly men hate the truth, they’d liefer
    Meet a tiger on the road.
    Therefore the poets honey their truth with lying; but religion—
    Vendors and political men
    Pour from the barrel, new lies on the old, and are praised for kind
    Wisdom. Poor bitch be wise.
    No: you’ll still mumble in a corner a crust of truth, to men
    And gods disgusting—you and I, Cassandra.

  14. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » COTO Report | Full Spectrum Defiance

  15. I have a dear friend who lives and works in DC. SHe and a coworker looked out the window on that fateful day and noticed that “isn’t that plane flying awfully low?” – then the panic began as the radios and tvs began announcing the NYC debacle. Nobody actually SAW the plane hit, according to those I know. But they are all convinced down there that that IS what took place. The only thing we have to fear is fear itself. But nobody believes that anymore, except me and maybe a few here?

  16. Ah well to go one step further, not of necessity the only way through the forest of lies around 9/11, but my path, as marked by the arrows I put on the trees, is to argue that taking the case to trial is a very fine way of demonstrating the totalitarian system works roughly like the political sciences texts tell. Justice delayed maybe, but taken to a hearing, evidence is set forth that is taken into consideration in a more formal way. Yes and we can base opinions on that evidence, legitmize that evidence, exclude other evidence more pertinent, and arrive at the facts of the matter. Nanothermate shall we say and not tactical nuclear weapons. Look over here, not over there. These are the facts set forth in court. These are the true things we can say because the judge has agreed to let them into evidence. Thus we discredit the theory that brings a greater crime into view. The crime of using nuclear weapons on US soil in an Auto-Golpe.

    Gallop’s case relies on virtually all forms of evidence admissible in court, but significantly, on published scientific evidence that residues of these explosives were found in the rubble after the attacks. In its totality the proffered case establishes that the government hypothesis – that the buildings collapsed due to fire in combination with the airplane impacts – is scientifically untenable.

  17. You really think it was a nuke? I seriously question judgment on that.

  18. I do. And it precisely the unthinkable aspect of GROUND ZERO ahem, that one needs must think over. Why are the mainstreaam Federally funded gents from respectable mainstream rightist institutions so willing to say nano thermatate. The dog does not bark in the night.

    Proven 9-11 Nukes = US Government Involvement: « Ed Ward, MD’s …
    Sep 6, 2010 … http://radiofetzer.blogspot.com/2010/02/dr-ed-ward-md.html. Setting the Record Straight on Mini Nukes in the WTC/9-11 …
    edwardmd.wordpress.com/…/proven-9-11-nukes-us-government- involvement/ – Cached

  19. I don’t find it suprizing that this hasn’t been widely publicised when the mainstream media has kept us away from the truth for so long. Good to know there are journalists like Rady that still have integrity. God speed Gallop!

  20. I attended the hearing. Incredibly, but not unexpected, there was not a member of the MSM to be seen despite a former US VP being one of the defendants. The Judges and their questions were very hostile toward Mr. Veale. The US Attorney replied with 2 or 3 sentences of legalese. One judge then asked her more than once if she was going to request sanctions. She replied she would not and that was it. It was over.

  21. I just wrote Veale:

    Dear Mr Veale ~

    One of our readers attended the hearing and said it was very brief, but that the judges were hostile to you.

    Are you going to write up anything about the hearing so we can post an update?

    Thank you,

    Rady Ananda
    Editor, COTO Report
    https://coto2.wordpress.com

  22. Pingback: Bush Cousin Is Judge in Explosive 9/11 Case | COTO Report

  23. Pingback: Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: Bush Cousin Is Judge in Explosive 9/11 Case against Bush Officials | Colonel6's Blog

  24. Pingback: Bush court dismisses 9/11 suit against Bush officials, orders sanctions | COTO Report

  25. Pingback: Bush court dismisses 9/11 suit against Bush officials, orders sanctions /  We know and will tell you all what really happened today

  26. Pingback: Bush Court Dismisses 9/11 Suit Against Bush Officials, Orders Sanctions : NOVAKEO.COM – Independent Journalism for the Independent Mind

  27. Pingback: April Gollop versus Dick Cheney: Court Dismisses 9/11 Suit against Bush Officials « Norcaltruth

  28. Pingback: April Gollop versus Dick Cheney: Court Dismisses 9/11 Suit against Bush Officials : Deadline Live With Jack Blood

  29. “cynical delusion and fantasy.” = 9/11 troofers.

  30. Pingback: Extraordinary Conflict of Interest: April Gallop-Bush Cousin Is Judge in Explosive 9/11 Case against Bush Officials | Colonel6's Blog

  31. Pingback: I want an explanation of this photo

  32. Pingback: Bush court dismisses 9/11 suit against Bush officials, orders sanctions - Infowars Ireland

  33. I was there. It made me sick to my stomach. One judge asked the woman attorney for the government multiple times if she would ask for sanctions. She said no the first time. The three judges reminded me of Cheney not allowing Bush to testify to the media without him.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s