Dr Alan Sabrosky: Israeli Involvement in 911

By PressTV
Broadcast date: 13 July 2011

In this edition of the show Susan Modaress interviews Alan Sabrosky, US Marine Corps Veteran.

Alan Sabrosky a writer and consultant, specializing in national and international security affairs discloses intriguing facts on the implication of Israel in 9/11 events that are by and large unheard of in mainstream media.

Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D., University of Michigan) is a writer and consultant specializing in national and international security affairs. In December 1988, he received the Superior Civilian Service Award after more than five years of service at the U.S. Army War College as Director of Studies, Strategic Studies Institute, and holder of the General of the Army Douglas MacArthur Chair of Research. He is listed in WHO’S WHO IN THE EAST (23rd ed.). A Marine Corps Vietnam veteran and a 1986 graduate of the U.S. Army War College, Dr. Sabrosky’s teaching and research appointments have included the United States Military Academy, the Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS), Middlebury College and Catholic University; while in government service, he held concurrent adjunct professorships at Georgetown University and the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS). Dr. Sabrosky has lectured widely on defense and foreign affairs in the United States and abroad. You can email Dr. Alan Sabrosky at: docbrosk@comcast.net


Treason, Betrayal and Deceit: 9/11 and Beyond

By Alan Sabrosky
Information Clearing House
September 10, 2009

The attacks on September 11, 2001 have been a defining moment for America. The political and psychological impact on Americans of a concerted and visible attack in America was enormous — indeed, it is an interesting “coincidence” that the attacks occurred on the one day of the year whose mention reinforces a public sense here of danger and emergency: 9-1-1.

A significant development in the 1990s was the formation of the neo-conservative think tank known as PNAC (Project for a New American Century), whose members prepared position papers for the Israeli government and for a future US Administration sharing their views. That happened in 2000 with the election of George W. Bush, and a contemporary writer summarized the tip of the neo-conservative iceberg in his first Administration this way:

The “outsiders” from PNAC were now powerful “insiders,” placed in important positions from which they could exert maximum pressure on US policy…PNAC had a lock on military policy-creation in the Bush Administration.

Especially significant in terms of subsequent events was the acknowledgement in one of PNAC’s own documents that their program for America (and Israel) would not readily be accepted by the American people. What this meant, PNAC opined in 2000, was that “the process of transformation, even if it brings revolutionary change, is likely to be a long one, absent some catastrophic and catalyzing event — like a new Pearl Harbor.”

9/11 Reconsidered

On September 11, 2001, the PNAC people in and out of government — and by extension AIPAC and Israel — “coincidentally” got the event they needed, barely eight months after coming into office. Most people are familiar with the basic details of that day — two commercial aircraft crashing into the two tallest buildings in New York City’s World Trade Center (WTC), a third striking the Pentagon, and a fourth ending up in a Pennsylvania field. Few people will forget the images of the burning buildings, their collapse, the casualties, and the sense of shock and tragedy that ensued.

The official 9/11 Commission’s work and report were at best an incomplete exercise. Many people dismiss the findings of the Commission, and that includes its co-chairs. Many others who utterly distrust the 9/11 Commission report, dismiss the US Government’s explanation of it, and point to both an official cover-up and an “inside job,” include veteran fighter pilots, EMTs (Emergency Medical Technicians), air defense experts, experienced commercial pilots, demolition experts, architects and civil engineers – none of them professions that inherently attract and retain the gullible and credulous.

Several things are very clear to me from a careful assessment of both official and critical evaluations of the 9/11 attacks. First, the striking aircraft alone simply could not have brought down either of the two buildings in the manner in which they fell, much less a third building which was not hit by a plane (I expect the one intended to do that as a “cover” had ended up in that Pennsylvania field), given the available physical evidence and a wealth of expert testimony. This means the attackers had assistance on the ground, and it had to have been active before the attacks occurred: preparing buildings for controlled demolition is not something done haphazardly in the midst of chaos.

Second, only two intelligence agencies had the expertise, assets, access and political protection to execute 9/11 in the air and on the ground: our CIA and Israel’s Mossad. Only one had the incentive, using the “who benefits” principle: Mossad. And that incentive dovetailed perfectly with the neo-con’s agenda and explicitly expressed need for a catalytic event to mobilize the American public for their wars, using American military power to destroy Israel’s enemies. Only the unexpected strength of the Iraqi resistance kept Syria and Iran from being attacked in the second Bush Administration. Thus, the evidential trail for 9/11 and the wars in Afghanistan & Iraq run from PNAC, AIPAC and their cohorts; through the mostly Jewish neo-cons in the Bush Administration; and back to the Israeli government. None of the denials and political machinations can alter that essential reality. Terms such as treason, betrayal and deceit do not overstate the case against them.

Finally, we need to take a hard look at why the mainstream media (MSM) have paid more attention to Sarah Palin’s wardrobe than they have to dissecting blatant falsehoods, discrepancies and inconsistencies in the US Government’s treatment of 9/11 and its aftermath. And the reason is that on this issue, all are on the same side, and the official line is the one they all prefer – “all” meaning the PNAC alumni who took over the Bush Administration’s national security apparatus and their counterparts in the Obama administration, AIPAC and the rest of the numerous Jewish PACs, the MSM owners and Israel. The depiction of the media management in America in 2002 is especially informative, and has not changed significantly since then:

CEOs and Directors of companies change as often as Boards of Directors vote. But if we could “freeze frame” the CEOs of the largest US Media companies in mid 2002, we would find that ten Jewish American men ran the vast majority of US television networks and other media companies including movies, radio, and publishing at that time. Not much has changed today.

Looking Ahead

Today we are getting the same line on Iran, from the same type of people — Obama himself tries to be more independent, but most of the key staff and national security people in his Administration do not differ greatly on Israel and the Middle East from those of his predecessor. And the Congress has shown itself to be even more of AIPAC’s lap-dog than the preceding Congress, an exercise in self-serving cowardice that admittedly has taken some doing.

But AIPAC and company are riding a tiger in America, and if they ever slip, the resulting convulsion will be catastrophic for them and for Israel. The open unfolding of the 9/11 tragedy and its ensuing wars that is now occurring can be that slip. The human cost to America to date is some 60,000 people, military and civilian, killed or wounded on 9/11 and in Iraq and Afghanistan together, with more to come once we go to war with Iran (or get dragged into it following an Israeli attack on Iran). Much of the deliberately misdirected rage that followed 9/11 has given way to endurance and grief.

But grief is a close cousin to rage, and an enraged America is not pretty, as anyone familiar with our history can appreciate. Americans are often deceptive without meaning to be. To much of the world, they often come across as naive, bumbling innocents in the world of global politics. And on a day-to-day basis, there is much truth to that.

But an enraged America is a very different character. You have only to look at what happened in WWII to German and Japanese cities, towns and villages, where America slaughtered literally millions of German and Japanese civilians — most of them women and children — knew it was doing it, and cared nothing at all. The goal was to crush, and restraint was not a word used much at all.

If these Americans and those like them ever fully understand just how much of their suffering — and the suffering we have inflicted on others — is properly laid on the doorsteps of Israel and its advocates in America, they will sweep aside those in politics, the press and the pulpits alike whose lies and disloyalty brought this about and concealed it from them. They may well leave Israel looking like Carthage after the Romans finished with it. It will be Israel’s own great fault.

Also see:

Palestine Israel and America the Strategic Void, 20 June 2011

Reprise on Palestine, Israel and America: A Strategic Void, 24 June 2011



Israeli Killed in Christchurch Earthquake Was Carrying Five Passports
Norway backs Palestine bid at UN; gets bombed 5 days later

13 responses to “Dr Alan Sabrosky: Israeli Involvement in 911

  1. You don’t like Jewish people, do you?

    • Jewish people are wonderful! Zionists, however, are nothing more than Nazi sympathizers and treasonous bungholes.

  2. From his June 20 post:

    “I do not advocate offensive weaponry – civilians are not trained or mentally equipped to use them effectively. But self-defense is an inherent right of everyone anywhere, and the only thing that will matter to Israel is if Israelis die in their attack on a flotilla or a convoy. Internationals who do not understand this elementary fact of political life should either stay away or acknowledge that they are only there for the show.”

  3. Sanity–typical response. You were not listening nor watching with an open mind. Other unquestionable evidence points in the same direction. It is NOT a matter of liking Jews, or Arabs or anyone else. It is a Matter of high treason and a threat to our Liberty, our Democracy and our Freedom. To me, someone with tunnel vision is as dangerous to our Freedoms as those who cary out such cowardly deeds. Thousands dies for the sake of the forwarding of another countries crap. That’s murder. I’ve spent the last ten years watching and listening.

  4. Something is fixin’ to break free, methinks. Big time. This guy, if he checks out with Susan as legit, is probably carrying water for the Bushies…notice how he neatly sidesteps the Bush Family ties to the security company in charge of the WTC on 9/11/2001 (Marvin)…and their ties to the Nazis and the Saudi Royals.

    Be all this as it may be, the Bushes, or those trying to protect them, are seeding this information very carefully and they NEVER do that without good cause.

    One can only hope the Obamanator is growing a pair and is actually calling the bluff of the Republicans and raising the stakes to full-blown martial law, possible dissolution of Congress, and the lockdown of the Bush compounds in Maine, Houston and Dallas by federal troops.

  5. 9/11 is a continuing criminal conspiracy which evidently implicates every nation on Earth by the SILENCE.

    In my opinion to grasp 9/11 you do have to grasp Pearl Harbor, and then grasp history. There are no white hats in history. History is a chronicle of crimes. States, that is men who have this power that is called State power, act beyond good and evil. 9/11 obviously was well considered. However, the operation failed. It failed on many levels. At a minimum the unfolding of the totalitarian state apparatus took more time no doubt than anticipated. Further, the truth is out and it is hard to put this back in the bag. Too many little inconsistentcies in the official story create a complex cover story that is easy to penetrate and ridicule.

    We can say US intel operations, Israeli, and British had to be crucial.
    Yet, other nations do not care. China doesn’t, key EU players do not care, Russia does not care, I doubt Brazil cares either. So this is a perfect crime. Americns don’t care and no one else does either.

  6. What I know from history, specifically the JFK assassination, is that David Crosby was able to stand up on a public stage at Monterey Pop in 1967 (4 years after the fact) and alert everyone that Kennedy was murdered by his own government. No doubt this lead to alot more violence and rioting in the streets, not to mention the advent of the Weather Underground.

    At four years post 2001, Professor Steven Jones had barely any following behind him whatsoever. Had Fox News and MSNBC (Tucker Carlson) failed to pick him up, he would have remained unnoticed by overseas scholars.

    The difference between 1963 and 2001 has been huge from the information-dissemination standpoint. So everything Goebbels said is still relevant and valid — the bigger and more insane the lie, the farther one stands outside the realm of the believable, the more likely it is that the lie becomes the truth.

    Look at what Catholicism was able to accomplish, folks! We have a massive number of people willing to fight and die in defense of the proposition that an enemy of both the Roman and Jewish states was hung up like a piece of carrion and, somehow, rose from the dead. Further, that a chocolate bunny-rabbit that lays eggs in your backyard is somehow representative of both this event AND the pagan fertility rites of Spring!

    Astounding. As Sadat said as he lay dying, “incredible.”

  7. Was the third building also pulverised like the other two buildings? Have never heard anything about what became of that building, except from having seen videos of it falling down so mysteriously – and so perfectly.

  8. Vilaar:
    That is interesting, thankyou for your answer.
    That makes it even more mysterious, doesn’t it.

  9. The whole is the implicate order. I do not think that there is one center of power but more like groupings of powers ith some goals in common and some goals not in common. London has one axis, Washington another, Tel-Aviv yet another and Berlin or Paris or Moscow others still. Some see Satanists, others see Communists, some see Zionists, others see Das Kapital. This implicate order is a pyramid in one sense and a network in another. It is a hierarchy of power money and authority within national states and within international organizations and at the same time it is networks of individuals and corporate/political money

    If this order has a single objective it is domination of planet Earth by the use of full spectrum dominance. The nation state is part of the implicate order but the transational corporate/political aspects are now more important. The Neo-Feudal global order that seems to be emergent in Century 21 utilizes nation states and their elites and armed forces as assets. Terrorist/symbolic actions accomplish multiple goals. And since these actions are compartmentalized and co-ordinated a certain amount of ambiguity is retained. Like the killing of Trotsky, you have more than one team oprational and each team has a different operational reason but the end goal is the same. A perversion of the Kantian ideal of global governance by reversion to Bronze Age barbarism. Israel is an important part of this implicate order but despite PNAC and dual citizenship it is not the controlling aspect of it.

  10. Pingback: Norway backs Palestine bid at UN; gets bombed 5 days later | COTO Report

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s