Blackberry agrees to join UK censors during civil unrest

By Avril Ormsby

BlackBerry said on Thursday it would close down its hugely popular messenger service in Britain if ordered to at times of civil unrest, after police singled out the system as a key tool used in last month’s riots.

Appearing before politicians investigating the large-scale disorder that swept Britain in early August, executive Stephen Bates of Blackberry-owner Research in Motion said the company would comply with orders given in special circumstances such as threats of terrorism or mass criminality.

“From our perspective we comply with the law and if the instruction … would be to close down the mobile networks which is the method by which that would be enacted, we would then comply, we would then work with those mobile operators to help them meet the obligations as defined by that act,” Bates said.

Police and parliamentarians said at the time of the unrest that social media, in particular Blackberry Messenger (BBM), had been used by rioters and looters to incite and coordinate violence.

BBM appears to have been preferred over Twitter and other social media sites because its messages are encrypted and private.

Speaking when police were still grappling with nights of violence in London and other major English cities, Prime Minister David Cameron said Britain could consider disrupting online social networking during civil unrest, a move which is widely condemned as repressive when used by other countries.

Since then however, the government has said it was unlikely it would go that far, after the home secretary, Theresa May, met with police and executives from RIM, Twitter and Facebook.

Bates said the company had a strong view that communications and social media were a force for good and it didn’t see it “being a good way forward” to suspend social networks during periods of large-scale disorder.

Alexander Macgillivray, responsible for public policy at Twitter, told the committee it would be an “absolutely horrible idea” to do so, and quoted police as saying they used it for good during times of crisis.

Richard Allan, director of policy in Europe at Facebook, said social media allowed families and friends to know they were safe.

RIM has previously said it cooperates with local law enforcement and regulatory officials, but it has declined to say whether it would hand over chat logs or user details to police.


Of course, rather than address the cause of civil unrest (poverty), authoritarians prefer to quash dissent by stifling electronic speech. ~ Ed.

5 responses to “Blackberry agrees to join UK censors during civil unrest

  1. Oh boy what a bunch of corporate spies we have in communications circles. We already know Facebook sells your personal data and now we know that Blackberry will do likewise. Only they will claim they are only obeying the law and they will shut down the system when told to in times of civil disobedience and unrest. Yeah right. Only then eh? Not on your life. The elites are constantly snooping into people private affairs because they are scared witless of us. They don’t trust us but then its little wonder when they treat people like criminals and beat the crap out of them if they so much as protest at the intimidationary behaviour of the law is it any wonder the people feel agreived and the so called legal protectors are shitting themselves. The usual excuses of resisting arrest or obstructing lawful enquiries are the order of the day and the judge merely goes along with it.
    Old Pagan saying: ‘What goes around comes around.’ Another Pagan saying: ‘Harm done to one will come back 3 fold on the perpetrator’.
    I am Pagan. 🙂

  2. Wonder if we can get them to close down their communications HQ at Cheltenham in times of civil unrest and disobedience? Include Menwith Hill near Harrogate too.
    All in the interests of fair play you understand.

  3. One thought just struck me. If they close the networks down in times of civil disobedience how are they going to collect all that incriminating evidence of wrong doing?
    Sounds to me like they are shooting themselves in the foot.
    Nice one big brother.

    • Quite unnecessary, old chap … as we have now seen many times, in matters of “terrorism”, no evidence is required. The same is presumably true for this new scourge of “mass criminality”.

  4. Good point. Never thought of it that way. I suppose it is only a matter of interpretation as to how they judge many people these days. Take Environmentalists. We are now classified as ecoterrorists and as such come under the same umbrella as terrorists of the sought after variety.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s