Pile of Skulls

skull pile 3By Robert C. Koehler
COTO Report

The boy is in his bed crying because there’s a monster in the room. Dad walks in, snaps on the light . . .

This is the setup for Joe Dator’s macabre, punch-in-the-nose-funny cartoon in a recent New Yorker. “See,” says Dad as he points to the wall, “there’s no monster in the corner — it’s just a pile of old skulls.”

Why, for God’s sake, did I think of this cartoon when I read about the newly released Global Terrorism Index?  Could it be that our childhood monsters — whom grownups call terrorists these days — are being manipulated for political purposes?

This first-of-its-kind index, based on data collected by the National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism, or START (which is headquartered at the University of Maryland), and published by the Institute for Economics and Peace, indicates that terrorist incidents across the globe have increased pretty much every year since 9/11 and the onset of the “war on terror.”

“In the decade since 9/11,” according to the Institute for Economics and Peace, “fatalities from terrorist attacks have increased by 195 percent, incidents by 460 percent and injuries by 224 percent.” The three countries suffering by far the largest number of such attacks, are — surprise, surprise — Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, the countries we’ve invaded or quasi-invaded.

In other words, this insane war is truly nothing less than a war to promote terror — which was my term for the war from the start.

If we allow this data to suck all the humor out of Dator’s cartoon, what we’re left with is the grim reality of geopolitics: self-created monsters (which of course turn real) and a pile of skulls. The skulls represent the damage, collateral and otherwise, that we, the militarized First World nations, do in pursuit of our interests and our monsters.

And of course, as Common Dreams points out, the definition of terrorism employed in the index is excruciatingly narrow: “illegal” use of force or violence by non-state actors to achieve a given end. Shock-and-awe bombing doesn’t count, even though the entirety of its purpose is to terrorize a whole nation; assassination by drone doesn’t count, even though armed drone surveillance paralyzes the normal social life of whole regions; and all the other overt and covert actions of state, from preemptive invasion to secretly orchestrated coup to the toxic and radioactive pollution of modern, high-tech, “legitimate” warfare don’t count as terrorism, even though they disseminate terror in every direction.

I return to the documented reality that none of these efforts achieve their stated aim, any more than the “war on drugs” has accomplished anything except to exponentially expand the scope of the international drug problem.

But our wars do generate an endless supply of enemies (actual human beings who have a grievance against us) and monsters (imagined human beings who want only to commit evil against us). Thus, while the Global Terrorism Index documents the former, no one much, besides cartoonists, pays attention to the latter, unless you count soldiers and returning vets — often diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder, i.e., a mental illness — who are committing suicide at astonishing rates.

A couple months ago I wrote about the concept of “moral injury,” which is a new, larger way of looking at PTSD, not as a mental illness but as the natural consequence of participating in the killing of human beings on command — of violating a hardwired sense of human empathy.

Most of us lack a capacity to kill. Dave Grossman, a psychologist and former Army Ranger, notes in his 1995 book On Killing that for most of human history, up to World War II, the actual killing in combat was done by as little as 20 percent of the participants. Seventy-five or 80 percent of the soldiers fired over the heads of the enemy or didn’t fire at all. This was not a known phenomenon until studies revealed it during World War II. During Vietnam, according to Grossman, changes in the training of soldiers — the use of person-shaped rather than bull’s-eye targets, intense dehumanization of the enemy and glorification of killing — managed to reduce the non-firing rate in combat to a mere 5 percent. The cost was an enormous surge in psychological trauma among returning vets.

Stripped of the military context in which they did what they did, they were left alone with their consciences — with the terrifying awareness that they had killed people. The pain of this was often intensified, for Vietnam and all subsequent vets, by a loss of belief in the validity of the war itself, for the simple reason that the wars were hellishly unnecessary.

To my mind, one of the most important implications of the breakthrough idea that conscience-wracked vets are dealing not with a “disorder” but with a moral injury, is that their condition is not isolated and individual but society-wide. Going to war is a collective decision and the consequences of doing so must also be borne collectively. But collectively we remain in denial, crying that there are monsters in the bedroom.

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist and nationally syndicated writer. His new book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound (Xenos Press) is now available. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com, visit his website at commonwonders.com or listen to him at Voices of Peace radio.

© 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

As you think about giving gifts with meaning this year, please consider my book, Courage Grows Strong at the Wound, which speaks with honesty and humor about the human condition. It’s especially appropriate for anyone who has suffered recent loss and is coping with the grieving process. Be aware also that the sale of the book supports this column and my ability to give a peace journalist’s perspective on current events. The book has been reduced in price through the end of the year.

Here’s what readers have said about it:

“So much you articulate is so familiar to me but has been without words for so long. I wonder how many of us there are? Lots, I bet. May your heart touch millions through your book. It is very healing.” — J.B.

“So I am on the train with tears in my eyes picturing you running to find Alison with fuchsia hair. Maybe reading your book on the train will require large sunglasses.” — R.W.

“By the way, I’m truly loving your book. Ripped through Part 1, blubbering a lot, highlighting much, and recently began Part II. I’m enjoying getting to see your innate wacky sense of humor. It’s a wonderful book.” — L.G.

“I am using this book as a daily reader for inspiration, challenge, comfort and all the other dimensions you have offered us. Thanks for giving us hope and encouragement!” — C.S.

The price, which includes shipping and handling, is reduced through the end of the year to $23. If you would like to place your order, please specify how many books and make out check for the appropriate amount to Robert Koehler. Please include your mailing address!

Mail to:

Robert Koehler
6729 N. Ashland
Chicago, IL 60626

The book will be sent to you as soon as possible. All books will be signed, of course.

About these ads

5 responses to “Pile of Skulls

  1. You said, “Could it be that our childhood monsters — whom grownups call terrorists these days — are being manipulated for political purposes?”

    The answer is: YES.

    See BBC production: The Power of Nightmares–
    http://www.dailykos.com/story/2007/12/22/425671/-Essential-BBC-documentaries-not-shown-on-US-TV

    Adam Curtis exposes the public manipulation we sense but usually don’t understand. His BBC documentaries are legendary in Britain but practically unknown in the US. An American network executive who wouldn’t even let his name be used said “we would be crucified if we showed that here”. These documentaries are like a graduate course in how the American and British public has been silently herded like cattle since the end of World War I.

  2. Thing is, all of these chickens, or monsters rather, will eventually come home to roost.

  3. We’ve hid the monsters behind state secrets long enough. It is time to get 2012′s H.R. 5956 or its equivalent passed.

  4. “[T]he definition of terrorism employed in the index is excruciatingly narrow: “illegal” use of force or violence by non-state actors to achieve a given end. Shock-and-awe bombing doesn’t count, even though the entirety of its purpose is to terrorize a whole nation; assassination by drone doesn’t count, even though armed drone surveillance paralyzes the normal social life of whole regions; and all the other overt and covert actions of state, from preemptive invasion to secretly orchestrated coup to the toxic and radioactive pollution of modern, high-tech, “legitimate” warfare don’t count as terrorism, even though they disseminate terror in every direction.”

    you said it, Bob. The US military is the worst and most destructive terrorist group ever formed by humanity.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s