World Trade Center Building 7’s Controlled Demolition: 9/11 Consensus Panel Releases New Evidence from Witness Testimonies and Architectural Drawings
June 2, 2014 –The 24-member 9/11 Consensus Panel – which includes physicists, chemists, engineers, commercial pilots, attorneys and lawyers – today announced three new studies confirming the controlled demolition of World Trade Center 7.
The studies scientifically refutes the U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) claim that, for the first time in history, fire caused the sudden and complete collapse of a large, fire-protected, steel-framed building on 9/11.
(Note that whereas the Consensus Panel uses a scientific methodology to peer-review its work, the NIST report was not peer-reviewed.)
The first Panel study deals with the NIST computer simulations, which purported to show that fire-induced thermal expansion caused a girder to be pushed off its seat at Column 79, thereby initiating a global collapse of the entire 47-storey building at 5:21 in the afternoon.
However, a recent FOIA request has produced WTC 7 architectural drawings showing that the NIST simulations omitted basic structural supports that would have made this girder failure impossible.
The second Consensus Panel study deals with NIST’s claim that it did not recover any steel from this massive steel-frame skyscraper.
This is extraordinary, given the need to understand why a steel-frame building would have completely collapsed for the first time in history from fire alone, and to thereby prevent a recurrence.
We know now that some of the steel was recovered. Photographs recently obtained by researchers show the strange curled-up paper-thin WTC 7 steel, with a NIST investigator pointing it out.
The third Panel study shows that on September 11, 2001, many people were told hours in advance that WTC 7 was going to collapse.
MSNBC reporter Ashleigh Banfield said early in the afternoon: “I’ve heard several reports from several different officers now that that is the building that is going to go down next.”
Many members of the New York Fire Department were confidently waiting for the building to come down:
Firefighter Thomas Donato: “We were standing, waiting for seven to come down. We were there for quite a while, a couple hours.”
Assistant Commissioner James Drury: “I must have lingered there. There were hundreds of firefighters waiting to — they were waiting for 7 World Trade Center to come down.”
Chief Thomas McCarthy: “So when I get to the command post, they just had a flood of guys standing there. They were just waiting for 7 to come down.”
In addition, CNN and the BBC made premature announcements.
This foreknowledge corroborates the evidence presented in previous Consensus Points (WTC7-1 to WTC7-5) that WTC 7 was brought down by controlled demolition.
Source: The 9/11 Consensus Panel consensus911@gmail.com @911consensus
Contact List: http://www.consensus911.org/media-contacts/
Co-founders: David Ray Griffin, Elizabeth Woodworth
Kindness is more than deeds. It is an attitude, an expression, a look, a touch. It is anything that lifts another person. ~ Goethe
Elizabeth Woodworth
betsylangert
bobkoehler
CasaZaza
coto2admin
cz85b
Denis Rancourt
geobear7
HeartThinks
jerseyg
laudyms
Mr. M
Michael Collins
ozspeaksup
Puddy Dunne
Rady
slindauer2010
Megan 'Verb' Kargher
tomdegan
volaar
COTO Report 
The root of worldwide deception was CHAOS and FEAR that Earth might be converted into a star by uncontrolled release of nuclear energy in late August 1945.
That convinced world leaders to “save the world from nuclear annihilation” by:
1. Uniting all nations under the UN on October 23, 1945
2. Forbidding public knowledge of energy (E) stored as mass (m) in cores of
_ a.) Heavy atoms like Uranium
_ b.) Some planets like Jupiter
_ c.) Ordinary stars like the Sun
_ d.) Galaxies like the Milky Way
_ e.) The expanding Universe
Today we all need to work toward peaceful reconciliation and healing of bruised egos by acknowledging that world leaders had legitimate reason to believe in August 1945 that Earth might be destroyed in the manner that Aston described in the last paragraph of his Nobel Prize Lecture on 12 December 1922.
Reblogged this on The GOLDEN RULE and commented:
Somewhat an overload of the conspiracy themes this week, yet there is ample justification. This COTO report is pretty much in the category of a ‘smoking gun’ category. Scientific and logical conclusions from real evidence that WTC7 was in fact an intentional demolition. To not accept this claim is to fly in the face of facts and to self-incriminate the assessor as being inept or corrupt.
There will be a great deal of inertia reacting against this because that implies proof of internal US authorities and individuals knowledge, collaboration and involvement in the whole 9/11 incident(s).
What is currently going on in Ukraine, Iraq and the Gaza or all more than loosely connected. The total corruption and agenda for resource and sovereign country control becomes more obvious to any lateral thinker.
So there is definite method in the “madness” of revisiting this “old” incident.
To me, the evidence is overwhelming, clear and indisputable. Also to many others who refuse to be brainwashed by the media and propaganda.
Not everyone has the time to spend learning and analyzing these issues but they are of extreme importance.