ClimateGate 2.0: New emails confirm temps not rising; science being manipulated AGAIN

By Corbett Report and Media Monarchy

Story #1: Fresh Round of Leaked Emails Called Climategate 2.0
Related: Background and Context
Related: New Batch of Emails Released in Climategate 2.0
Related: More Emails Leaked From Climate Researchers

Some of the emails:

“Observations do not show rising temperatures throughout the tropical troposphere unless you accept one single study and approach and discount a wealth of others. This is just downright dangerous. We need to communicate the uncertainty and be honest. Phil, hopefully we can find time to discuss these further if necessary […]”

“I also think the science is being manipulated to put a political spin on it which for all our sakes might not be too clever in the long run.”

“The trick may be to decide on the main message and use that to guid[e] what’s included and what is left out.”

“Mike, The Figure you sent is very deceptive […] there have been a number of dishonest presentations of model results by individual authors and by IPCC […]”
Story #2: NYPD Says FBI Declined to Pursue ‘Lone Wolf’ NYC Bomb Plot
Who Is Oscar Ortega-Hernandez and Why Did He Allegedly Try To Kill Obama?
Related: In Search of Lee Harvey Oswald with Charles Ochelli

Story #3: Oregon Tops Nation in Food Stamp Use
Video: News Report from KEZI 9 in Eugene, Oregon
Related: USDA Targets Stores in Food Stamp Trafficking

Chris Smith speaks with Shadow Climate Change Minister Greg Hunt about the leaked emails casting doubt on the science of climate change:

As new emails have been revealed, Aljazeera interviews the BBC’s Susan Watts in an early attempt to spin the latest ClimateGate revelations:

Even more videos have been posted at ClimateGate TV.

4 responses to “ClimateGate 2.0: New emails confirm temps not rising; science being manipulated AGAIN”

donny | November 24, 2011 at 11:25 pm | Reply

oh boy! More out-of-context email snippets. How manipulative!
Bruce Stegiel | November 24, 2011 at 11:39 pm | Reply

I do not think the context matters as much as the language used to demonstrate a dynamic about human knowledge: relationships trump truth. Especially when big money is involved. Climate science is part of a goal for Green Governance based on the Noble Lie. Why lie? If human beings are manipulating the climate significantly we need no lies, if they are not, why lie? If human beings have more impact than the SUN then men are GODs.
Kerstin | November 27, 2011 at 8:54 pm | Reply

If it is impossible to convince, go to plan B, start a confucing campagne.
bodhidharma | December 3, 2011 at 7:31 pm | Reply

It seems like any conspiracy will do around here. You should take this crap down. It is taking out of context quotes to make ridiculous claims, and makes the site look bad.