May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit on 9/11

9/11 Conspiracy Road Trip

By BBC Conspiracy Files

This May 10, 2011 interview of Dr. Niels Harrit, Associate Professor Emeritus of Chemistry at the University of Copenhagen, was conducted by Michael Rudin of the BBC. The occasion was the making of a new BBC production in the Conspiracy Files series for the tenth anniversary of 9/11.

Dr. Harrit calls the NIST report regaring WTC “scientific fraud.”

Copyright Niels Harrit.
(360p)

Following the BBC intro below is a  production of the BBC show which includes several interviewees, including former truther Charlie Veitch of the “Love Police” embracing the official version of events.

Just for the fun of it, because he’s so full of love, here’s Veitch calling truthers “fuckwits” and more:

BBC: A decade after the attacks that killed nearly 3,000 people in New York, Washington and Pennsylvania, the Conspiracy Files looks at why some people still question what really happened on 9/11. Conspiracy theories continue to evolve and now question every aspect of the official account. Why, they ask, was the hole in the Pentagon so small? Why did the World Trade Centre buildings collapse as if being demolished by explosives? Why did one skyscraper fall when it was never hit by a plane? And why was the world’s greatest military power so unprepared and so slow to react when warnings had been received?

The death of Osama Bin Laden might have been expected to put an end to the conspiracy theories, but the failure to release any pictures of Bin Laden’s death and the hasty disposal of his body in the Arabian Sea, has instead given these theories a new burst of life.

Featuring key witnesses, CIA and FBI interviewees and leading sceptics, the programme analyses the evidence and looks at what makes conspiracy theories so persistent and so powerful.

Here’s  5-part version:

One response to “May 2011 BBC Interview with Dr. Niels Harrit on 9/11

  1. the poor BBC reporter seriously needs to take some classes about what constitutes evidence. He also needs to take some science classes; his liberal arts bachelor’s degree (assuming he even finished college) clearly did not impart basic science.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s