Good Violence, Bad Violence

By Robert C. Koehler
COTO Report

“In the end, after he has felt the full force of our justice system, what will be remembered are the good people who were impacted by this tragedy,” President Obama said this week in Aurora, Colo., after the shootings.

That’s probably not true.

From Charles Whitman up to the present day, the collective American memory preserves the name of the killer . . . the lone psycho, the shadow hero. We’re far too fascinated with violence not to mythologize its perpetrators. And just as we all know (because the media tell us) that there will be a “next war,” we know, oh God, in the deep churnings of the heart, that there will be more murder victims — schoolchildren, college students, shoppers, churchgoers, theatergoers, bystanders. We know because we live in a culture that tolerates and perpetuates violence.

James Holmes may have been a “loner,” but, like his predecessors, he acted in a complex American context. He wasn’t alone at all.

The U.S. is far more violent than other developed countries, for reasons seldom addressed or even looked at in anything like a holistic way. The root of the matter, as I see it, is our false distinction between “good violence” and “bad violence.” We don’t address the issue systemically because of our social investment in “good violence” and the enormous payoff it delivers to some. But good violence — the authorized, glorified, “necessary” kind — inevitably morphs into bad violence from time to time, and thus we are delivered jolts of headline-grabbing horror on a regular basis.

The factors that make up our culture of violence include, but are hardly limited to, the following:

A. The easy availability of guns, including semiautomatic weapons, ammunition and other paraphernalia. Holmes, for instance, not only purchased some 6,000 rounds of ammo on the Internet but “a high-capacity ‘drum magazine’ large enough to hold 100 rounds and capable of firing 50 or 60 rounds per minute — a purchase that would have been restricted under proposed legislation that has been stalled in Washington for more than a year,” according to the New York Times.

A culture of fear and the popular association of guns with personal empowerment guarantee that simply stanching the availability of high-capacity killing equipment to angry loners slipping into mental illness isn’t likely anytime soon. Indeed, we’re going the wrong direction. The AR-15 semiautomatic rifle Holmes used had been illegal under the federal ban on assault weapons that Congress allowed to expire in 2004. One unaddressed question: To what extent does easy access to military weaponry inspire lost souls even to consider mass murder as their ticket to glory and public attention?

B. The media — entertainment and news — feed the popularity of “good violence.” Violence is the driving plot device for thousands of forgettable, special-effects-permeated flicks. Its opposite is wimpiness. Movie and TV violence is abstract and consequence-free: the quickest way to solve a problem, find love, attain manhood, do good. America’s Army, the violent but bloodless videogame maintained by the U.S. Army, sucks in 13-year-olds. Violence occupies the American consciousness. “Why are we violent but not illiterate?” asked journalist Colman McCarthy. The answer: We’re taught to read.

As our newspapers collapse and TV culture permeates American households, the distinction between news and entertainment continues to blur. Peace and nonviolence are far too complex to grab readers’ and viewers’ attention. Violence sells. Violence advertises. Give us a war, any war, and the media will line up behind it, at least until it starts to go bad. “I guess I was part of the groupthink,” Bob Woodward lamented several years into the Iraq war, when the Washington Post examined its failure to be the least bit critical of the disaster initially. A serious part of the defense budget is public relations; it’s always money well spent.

C. Violence drives government policy. We’re now engaged in an endless, Orwellian war against dark-skinned, foreign evil. The “Washington consensus” is the same thing as the military-industrial complex. We torture, we carpet-bomb. We’ve wrecked two countries, killed civilians by the thousands or hundreds of thousands. We assassinate by drone and keep our civilian kill-count low by regarding all military-age males as combatants (by which measure, seven of Holmes’ victims shouldn’t count). We’re continuing to develop the “next generation” of nuclear weapons.

Violence also drives domestic policy. Our prison-industrial complex is the largest in the world — and becoming privatized. We have no mercy on the poor. Social spending bears the brunt of “austerity.” The police are becoming increasingly militarized. We control through punishment, which seems to be the same thing as revenge (“. . . after he has felt the full force of our justice system . . .”).

D. We worship winning and create unity around common enemies. Racism is endemic. We live in a domination culture; competition rules, even in education settings. The default American truism is “survival of the fittest.” Everything we do is based on the military model. We go to war against all our problems rather than try to heal them. We think love means weakness. Sonia Sotomayor was mocked as the “empathy nominee” for Supreme Court justice.

Good violence is the original bait-and-switch. As we mourn the latest to die so unnecessarily, let us vow not to let our grief turn to revenge.

© 2012 TRIBUNE MEDIA SERVICES, INC.

Robert Koehler is an award-winning, Chicago-based journalist. His new book, “Courage Grows Strong at the Wound” (Xenos Press) is now available in bookstores. Contact him at koehlercw@gmail.com or visit his website at commonwonders.com.

Courage Grows Strong at the Wound is a personal look at peace. It would be an excellent gift for anyone who has suffered a recent loss. Book sales support this column and my ability to give a peace journalist’s perspective on current events.

The price, which includes shipping and handling, is $25. If you would like to place an order, please specify how many books and make out check for the appropriate amount to Robert Koehler. Please include your mailing address!

Mail to:

Robert Koehler
6729 N. Ashland
Chicago, IL 60626

The book will be sent to you as soon as possible. All books will be signed, of course.

6 responses to “Good Violence, Bad Violence

  1. Great piece, I think your spot on in your description of some compounding factors fueling the violent tendencies within our American culture (the list could go on). I am currently reprogramming my own consciousness with copious amounts of reggae.The only aspect of your description that I have trouble accepting is that alone, the availability of weapons somehow perpetuates a violent state of mind. I admit that owning guns is often associated with a false sense of safety, when in actuality their presence is hazardous when handled incorrectly, and there are few things in this country available to the public that can destroy lives so efficiently. With that being said, the effectiveness of gun control is only temporary without addressing the previous factors described by Mr. Koehler. I live in Idaho and spent five years in the US Navy (Seabees). I admit, when I got back after nine months of OIF I bought a hunting rifle to replace the one I had slept with and carried everywhere for so long. Does that make you uncomfortable? It shouldn’t, because it never goes to town and only fires at paper targets.
    Also, I immensely enjoy the COTO REPORT. Glad to see more articles, hope all is well.

  2. couple points that were on the edge of being hit Robert:

    the gun myth – please look at the states with the most restrictive gun laws vs the least restrictive and compare their rates of gun violence

    government violence – please look at holmes’ parents and govt programs like mk-ultra. anyone else tired of the lone gunman cliche yet? apparently the ruling class feels more frequent and smaller false flags will do the same job large false flags have achieved to date. guess there are not enough hurricanes and droughts for the ruling class to mis-handle enough to steal lives, property and rights away from otherwise disaster surviving citizens.

    while the approach to understanding our own psyche is valuable, it also has a drawback – the tendency to somehow blame ourselves for what the ruling class is clearly intentionally using to target us. sure the best way to avoid predators is to not be prey. just the same, there is only so much we can do to avoid the pogroms the ruling class seems determined to ratchet up while eliminating the middle class.

    thank you and please keep up the good writing

  3. Spot on. You really could write a whole book about this. Thanks, Bob.

  4. Pingback: Motvallsbloggen » Vart är USA på väg?

  5. Violence is ingrained in American culture. We were built on slave plantations and indian massacres. This permeates into pop culture that tries to justify violence by making it look dark, cool.

  6. What a sack of horseshit.
    Yes the article is basically spot-on except for one thing, James Holmes never pulled a trigger. The entire shooting is a false-flag.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s