Full-body scanners may damage human DNA

Corporate media version of what body scanners show (compare to below)

By Mike Adams
NaturalNews

In researching the biological effects of the millimeter wave scanners used for whole body imaging at airports, NaturalNews has learned that the energy emitted by the machines may damage human DNA.

Millimeter wave machines represent one of two primary technologies currently being used for the “digital strip searches” being conducted at airports around the world. “The Transportation Security Administration utilizes two technologies to capture naked images of air travelers – backscatter x-ray technology and millimeter wave technology,” reports the Electronic Privacy Information Center, a non-profit currently suing the U.S. government to stop these electronic strip searches. (http://epic.org/privacy/airtravel/b…)

In order to generate the nude image of the human body, these machines emit terahertz photons — high-frequency energy “particles” that can pass through clothing and body tissue.

The manufacturers of such machines claim they are perfectly safe and present no health risks, but a study conducted by Boian S. Alexandrov (and colleagues) at the Center for Nonlinear Studies at Los Alamos National Laboratory in New Mexico showed that these terahertz waves could “…unzip double-stranded DNA, creating bubbles in the double strand that could significantly interfere with processes such as gene expression and DNA replication.”

In layman’s terms, any time you’re talking about interfering with “gene expression” and “DNA replication,” you’re essentially talking about something that could be a risk to human health.

Never approved as safe for humans

“At first glance, it’s easy to dismiss any notion that they can be damaging,” reports TechnologyReview.com (http://www.technologyreview.com/blo…). “But a new generation of cameras are set to appear that not only record terahertz waves but also bombard us with them. And if our exposure is set to increase, the question that urgently needs answering is what level of terahertz exposure is safe.”

And yet no such long-term safety testing has ever been conducted by a third party. There have been no clinical trials indicating that multiple exposures to such terahertz waves, accumulated over a long period of time, are safe for humans. The FDA, in particular, has never granted its approval for any such devices even though these devices clearly qualify as “medical devices.”

(If you try to sell an X-ray imaging device yourself, without FDA approval, you’ll be arrested. So why do these TSA suppliers get away with selling human body imaging equipment that has never been adequately safety tested or approved by the FDA?)

The study cited in the TechnologyReview article mentioned above is visible at: http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294

There, study authors conclude: “Based on our results we argue that a specific terahertz radiation exposure may significantly affect the natural dynamics of DNA, and thereby influence intricate molecular processes involved in gene expression and DNA replication.”

In other words, millimeter wave scanning devices may damage your DNA.


(These images depict what the TSA sees when air passengers are subjected to full-body scans using millimeter wave technology and / or backscatter X-rays.)

Could these scans cause cancer and birth defects?

Could these scans cause infertility? Cancer? Shortened lifespan? We don’t yet know the answers to these questions, but then again neither does the TSA. This technology is being recklessly rolled out without adequate safety testing that would prove it safe for long-term use.

How many times in the past have the “experts” told us technologies were perfectly safe and then later we found out they were dangerous? X-Rays were once used in shoe stores to see if new shoes would fit the bone structure of your feet. High-voltage power lines are perfectly safe, we’re told — but then why do children who live closer to those lines have higher rates of cancer?

Dentists still claim that mercury fillings are perfectly safe for your health — a preposterous notion — and cell phone companies continue to insist that cell phone radiation isn’t hazardous to your health at all. Time and time again, the public has been lied to by the authorities during the roll-out of some new technology. Why should we believe that full-body scanners are safe when they’ve never been proven safe? Furthermore, there is now reason to believe they may damage human DNA.

What if the experts are wrong about their safety and ten years later we find out that there is cumulative DNA damage that causes infertility and cancer? What if air travelers who subject themselves to this radiation wind up suffering some currently-unknown health condition as a result? At no time in the history of human civilization have large numbers of humans ever been subjected to terahertz bombardment of this type and frequency.

Sure, you can argue that you get more radiation sitting in an airplane at high altitude than you get from a full-body scanner, or you can explain that cell phones emit far more radiation on the whole (which they do, when you’re talking on them anyway). But if there’s one thing we all should have learned about radiation by now it’s that frequencies matter. The terahertz frequencies have never been rolled out en masse in a scanning technology. Who’s to say they’re going to be safe?

What about pregnant women? Can the TSA absolutely guarantee that these full-body scanners won’t damage the DNA of the unborn babies? What if this technology becomes the next Thalidomide and ten months from now women start giving birth to mutant babies who were damaged by terahertz radiation?

I’m not saying this is going to happen, but wouldn’t it be wise to determine the safety of this technology in advance of its global rollout?

As the National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements admitted in a 2002 report that studied these security devices: (http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/AC…)

“[We] cannot exclude the possibility of a fatal cancer attributable to radiation in a very large population of people exposed to very low doses of radiation.”

Barring solid evidence of the safety of this terahertz-emitting technology, the TSA would be wise to follow the Precautionary Principle which states that we should err on the side of caution when it comes to the roll out of new technologies. Unfortunately, the TSA appears to be erring on the side of stupidity by subjecting the public to an unproven, “experimental” technology with unknown long-term effects on human DNA.

And here’s the real kicker: These full-body scanners do nothing to stop terrorists because they can’t detect powder explosives in the first place. A determined terrorist can hide all sorts of powder in a shoe, or a sleeping pillow, or a plastic bag sewn into the side of his carry-on luggage. There are a thousand places for terrorists to hide explosives that won’t be caught on full-body scanners, no matter how detailed the images are.

Besides, in order to avoid engaging in child pornography (because these machines offer very detailed depictions of body parts), the rules will allow people under 18 years of age to bypass them. So all you need then, if you’re a terrorist, is a 17-year-old terrorist assistant who can pack explosives in his own underwear.

Radiology experts claim full-body scanners are safe

Radiology experts are claiming that the radiation emitted from these full-body scanners is perfectly safe for you. Then again, they also claim mammograms are safe, and recent science has now proven that mammograms cause cancer.

When it comes to radiation safety, you can’t trust radiologists. They say all that radiation is safe for YOU, but then they flee the room when the X-rays are turned on, ever notice that? They really have zero credibility when talking about the long-term safety of medical imaging devices. Most doctors, similarly, don’t have any real clue how much radiation is emitted by a CT scan!

As BusinessWeek reports: (http://www.businessweek.com/lifesty…)

“The health effects of the more common millimeter-wave scanners are largely unknown, and at least one expert believes a safety study is warranted.

‘I am very interested in performing a National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements study on the use of millimeter-wave security screening systems,’ said Thomas S. Tenforde, council president.”

The New York Times adds: (http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/h…)

“Collectively, the radiation doses from the scanners incrementally increase the risk of fatal cancers among the thousands or millions of travelers who will be exposed, some radiation experts believe.”

NYT goes on to state that the TSA has entered into a contract under which it could purchase 900 full-body scanners to be deployed in airport all across the country.

Resources:

Physics Letters, January 8, 2010
http://arxiv.org/abs/0910.5294

Technology Review:
http://www.technologyreview.com/blo…

Wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Millim…

New York Times:
http://www.nytimes.com/2010/01/09/h…

About these ads

43 responses to “Full-body scanners may damage human DNA

  1. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Full-body scanners may damage human DNA « COTO Report

  2. Body scanning machines are a violation to my privacy by essentially behaving like a a virtual strip search!! Also, just think about the new technology that the machines are using. ‘T light’ is a new kind of technology, how can I know what kind of effects it can do on your body and your organs! Only those terrorists should be scanned!!!-see for yourself: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terahertz_radiation

  3. Pingback: COTO Report Tops 100,000 Visitors « COTO Report

  4. Pingback: Top Ten Posts Week Ending Feb. 11 « COTO Report

  5. Pingback: If you don’t believe Egyptian Mummies can be clone, click here! « LISTEN TO THE RED SHAMAN

  6. Pingback: Top Ten Posts Week Ending March 11 « COTO Report

  7. Pingback: Top Ten Posts Week Ending March 19 « COTO Report

  8. Pingback: Top Ten Posts Week Ending March 25 « COTO Report

  9. Pingback: Top Ten Posts Week Ending April 1 « COTO Report

  10. Pingback: Scan WOW: Change your physique for TSA « COTO Report

  11. Pingback: Naked Body Scanners: Should You Have To Give Up The Right To Privacy & Risk Your Health?

  12. Pingback: Airport Body Scanner Revolution | Flecks of... Gray?

  13. Pingback: Naked Body Scanners: Should You Have To Give Up The Right To Privacy Or Risk Your Health? | Conservatives for America

  14. Viral humor:

    Here’s a solution to all the controversy over full-body scanners at the airports:

    All we need to do is develop a booth that you can step into that will not X-ray you, but will detonate any explosive device you may have hidden on or in your body. The explosion will be contained within the
    sealed booth.

    This would be a win-win for everyone.

    This is so simple that it’s brilliant. I can see it now: you’re in the airport terminal and you hear a muffled explosion. Shortly
    thereafter an announcement comes over the PA system, “Attention standby passengers, we now have a seat available on flight number…”

    Works for me.

  15. This writer really needs to do more research. First of all, being in the radiology profession, I can tell you that x-rays, CT, mammograms, etc. ARE harmful to you. The reason the scans are done is because the benefits outweigh the risks. I have not met a single person in the radiology profession that thinks that these procedures are 100% safe.

    Second of all, the scanners operate at 3 THz frequency, which is well below 430-750 THz radiation exposure that we are exposed to everyday in the form of visible light. In fact, our body naturally produces infrared radiation in the THz range from body heat. All radiation below ultraviolet radiation is non-ionizing and cannot cause cancer.

    The only good point that the writer makes is that there should be extensive safety tests and FDA approval before the scanners are used. Just because the radiation is non-ionizing does not mean that it is necessarily harmless, and safety testing has always been done for new technologies above and below the non-ionizing radiation energy levels.

  16. you miss the point, Jeff. Why should we be subjected to a virtual strip search for the right to travel?

    The violation of privacy far outweighs the “benefits” — as far as I can tell, and statistics back me up on this, there are no benefits. TSA has not stopped a single terrorist by these machines.

    Not one.

    Quit shilling for perverts.

  17. Seriously? It boggles my mind how much of a defense put up over these machines. They take like two seconds, are completely hands free, etc. Do you really think the people behind the scenes watching the monitor have their pants down around their ankles? Please, get over yourself.

    You’ve seen reports of TSA missing stuff in pat downs and such, if they are still missing things with this machine atleast its faster for me LOL.

  18. Great information. Lucky me I ran across your blog by accident (stumbleupon).

    I have saved as a favorite for later!

  19. I think that what you published made a ton of sense.
    However, think on this, what if you added a little content?
    I mean, I don’t wish to tell you how to run your blog, but suppose you added a title to maybe grab folk’s attention?
    I mean Full-body scanners may damage human DNA | COTO Report is
    kinda boring. You ought to look at Yahoo’s front page and note how they create news titles to grab viewers to open the links. You might add a related video or a pic or two to get readers interested about everything’ve got to say.
    In my opinion, it could make your posts a little bit more interesting.

  20. I’m not that much of a internet reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep
    it up! I’ll go ahead and bookmark your site to come back down the road. Cheers

  21. Wonderful article! This is the type of information that are meant to be shared across the internet.
    Shame on the seek engines for not positioning this post higher!
    Come on over and discuss with my site . Thanks =)

  22. I usually loved viewing this particular web-site weekly or more since
    you actually do generally have got some good articles so well done from one
    of your enthusiasts!

  23. Thanks for the marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it, you will
    be a great author.I will make sure to bookmark your blog and definitely will come back at some point.
    I want to encourage one to continue your great writing, have
    a nice afternoon!

  24. Wow that was odd. I just wrote an incredibly long comment but after I clicked submit
    my comment didn’t appear. Sucks! Anyways, just wanted to say excellent blog!
    My wife and I frequently write guest posts for other blog site owners to help increase exposure to our work, as well as provide good articles to blog owners. It really is a win win situation! If you happen to be interested feel free to email me so we can talk further. Thanks alot :)!

  25. Great information once again.
    I am looking forward for your next post!

  26. The Crust: On the box they use the words “upper” crust so lets talk about that first.
    Often that’s what prospects do when you annoy them with your barketing. What do you think when a new potential supplier approaches you with the selling phrase, “I’m as good as the one you
    use now”.

  27. iż któryś ze
    amantów potknął się o żyłka, Deloris natomiast
    obecnie patrzy niedowierzająco natomiast za przelotnie
    bluźnie niezrozumiałym przekleństwem.
    Dalej zwróci swoją sulicę, skrzyknie druhów i kiedy.

  28. Hello, I enjoy reading all of your article post. I wanted to write a little comment to support you.

  29. z, którym onegdaj płynęła ciek,
    srebrzył się drgającymi rybami, Sylvia chwytającymi powietrze spazmatycznymi ruchami skrzeli.
    Ówczesny w tamtym miejscu karaski, leszcze,
    jazie, nawet parę jesiotrów jak i również zabłą.

  30. Thanks on your marvelous posting! I actually enjoyed reading it,
    you’re a great author.I will remember to bookmark your blog and will come back someday. I want to encourage one to continue your great posts, have a nice day!

  31. It’s really very difficult in this busy life to listen news on TV, so I just use web for that purpose, and obtain the hottest news.

  32. Hi to all, because I am genuinely eager of reading this blog’s post to be updated regularly. It carries pleasant material.

  33. We’re a group of volunteers and starting a new scheme in our community. Your website provided us with valuable info to work on. You’ve done an impressive job and our
    whole community will be grateful to you.

  34. I’m not that much of a online reader to be honest but your sites really nice, keep it up!

    I’ll go ahead and bookmark your website to come back down the road. All the best

  35. To add icing to the exceptional islands of the best service at the beach,
    luxurious shopping extravaganza, and sumptuously opulent dining.
    Going to some reputed organization will ensure total
    piece of mind.

  36. Hi there mates, fastidious post and nice arguments commented here,
    I am in fact enjoying by these.

  37. Pingback: kymberspassionateworries | Full-body scanners may damage human DNA

  38. Nice post. I learn something totally new and challenging
    on sites I stumbleupon everyday. It will always be helpful to read
    through articles from other writers and practice something from their sites.

  39. hi!,I like your writing very much! percentage we communicate more about your post on
    AOL? I need an expert in this area to resolve my problem.
    Maybe that’s you! Looking ahead to see you.

  40. Thanks for finally talking about >Full-body scanners may damage human DNA | COTO Report <Liked it!

  41. I am sure this post has touched all the internet people, its really really pleasant piece of writing on building
    up new weblog.

  42. “How many times in the past have the “experts” told us technologies were perfectly safe and then later we found out they were dangerous? X-Rays were once used in shoe stores to see if new shoes would fit the bone structure of your feet. High-voltage power lines are perfectly safe, we’re told — but then why do children who live closer to those lines have higher rates of cancer?” – What the fuck? Evidence, please. Let’s just turn off the power where you are and maybe we don’t have to hear this.

    “Dentists still claim that mercury fillings are perfectly safe for your health — a preposterous notion — and cell phone companies continue to insist that cell phone radiation isn’t hazardous to your health at all. Time and time again, the public has been lied to by the authorities during the roll-out of some new technology. Why should we believe that full-body scanners are safe when they’ve never been proven safe? Furthermore, there is now reason to believe they may damage human DNA.

    What if the experts are wrong about their safety and ten years later we find out that there is cumulative DNA damage that causes infertility and cancer? What if air travelers who subject themselves to this radiation wind up suffering some currently-unknown health condition as a result? At no time in the history of human civilization have large numbers of humans ever been subjected to terahertz bombardment of this type and frequency.” – Cell phones are safe. http://www.debunkosaurus.com/debunkosaurus/index.php/Cell_phones

    As for the “damaging human DNA” part, I need a lot more than your word. Or, maybe it’s the cause for homosexuality, because THAT is a mental defect, mind you.

    Electrical power lines causing cancer and mental defects…oh, that’s good. So what about the Third World, which has the lowest IQ and the lowest number of power lines? What do you do, then?

    Why, it proves your logic is bullshit. Correlation does not prove causation.

  43. Very great post. I simply stumbled upon your weblog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts.
    After all I’ll be subscribing on your rss feed and I’m
    hoping you write again very soon!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s