Cognitive Infiltration: Cass Sunstein vs David Ray Griffin on 9/11 Truth

By Redacted News

The paper “Conspiracy Theories” by Harvard law professors Cass Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule is a warning for all 9/11 Truth groups. Although the paper is allegedly about conspiracy theory in a general sense, it is clearly centered on 9/11. I submit that this indicates a rising concern within certain powerful but ill-defined circles. Below is a self-explanatory segment from Sunstein’s Wikipedia page as well as Dr. David Ray Griffin’s new book, Cognitive Infiltration: An Obama Appointee’s Plan to Undermine the 9/11 Conspiracy Theory.

Sunstein co-authored a 2008 paper with Adrian Vermeule, titled Conspiracy Theories, in which they wrote, “The existence of both domestic and foreign conspiracy theories, we suggest, is no trivial matter, posing real risks to the government’s antiterrorism policies, whatever the latter may be.” 

They go on to propose that, “the best response consists in cognitive infiltration of extremist groups”,[19] where they suggest, among other tactics, “Government agents (and their allies) might enter chat rooms, online social networks, or even real-space groups and attempt to undermine percolating conspiracy theories by raising doubts about their factual premises, causal logic or implications for political action.”[19]

Sunstein and Vermeule also analyze the practice of secret government payments to outside commentators, who are then held out as independent experts; they suggest that “government can supply these independent experts with information and perhaps prod them into action from behind the scenes,” further warning that “too close a connection will be self-defeating if it is exposed.”[19]

Sunstein and Vermeule argue that the practice of enlisting non-government officials, “might ensure that credible independent experts offer the rebuttal, rather than government officials themselves. There is a tradeoff between credibility and control, however. The price of credibility is that government cannot be seen to control the independent experts.” 

This position has been criticized by some commentators, [20] [21] who argue that it would violate prohibitions on government propaganda aimed at domestic citizens.[22]

Shortly after taking office on January 20, 2009 President Obama appointed Harvard law professor (and personal friend) Cass Sunstein to the post of administrator of the White House Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs. In June 2009 Sunstein published an essay in The Journal of Political Philosophy entitled “Conspiracy Theories: Causes and Cures,” in which he provided an “analysis” of conspiracy theories, viewing them, as his title indicated, as “caused” by psychological conditions and requiring “cures”, i.e., elimination. The article led to an outcry by civil libertarians of all political stripes, who especially singled out for protest Sunstein’s call for covert “cognitive infiltration” by government agents of organizations the government deems “conspiracist”. 

Because Sunstein explicitly states that “9/11 conspiracy theories” are his main focus, virtually all interpreters have agreed that Sunstein’s call for what is essentially another Cointelpro Operation is directed specifically against the 9/11 truth movement. (Cointelpro, or “Counter Intelligence Program”, was the FBI’s name for its high-priority operations to infiltrate, provoke, undermine and disable civil rights, socialist, antiwar, black power and Native American movements during the late 1950s and the 1960s.) The fantastic picture Sunstein paints of the 9/11 truth movement as “harmful,” “dangerous,” and likely to resort to “terrorism” suggests that he is serving a function similar to Philip Zelikow’s during the Bush/Cheney years; in his own way, Sunstein too is a “myth-maker.” 

In his new book COGNITIVE INFILTRATION David Ray Griffin has provided the first truly adequate response to Sunstein’s deeply-flawed and legally-questionable arguments. Griffin penetrates the obfuscation and phony scholarship employed by Sunstein to create the illusion of a rational critique of the 9/11 truth movement’s alternative account of the events of September 11, 2001. Griffin presents a series of ten theses put forward by Sunstein, and shows that each is fundamentally flawed. Further, he demonstrates that Sunstein is unable to avoid numerous self-contradictions, either explicit or implied, that together amount to an internal, hidden counter-argument to his own position, which Griffin, in a novel and entertaining approach, brings out as an ironic “esoteric” meaning of Sunstein’s essay. 

Griffin demonstrates that Sunstein is completely unable to refute the major positions of the 9/11 truth movement, and doesn’t actually even try to do so. Instead, Sunstein has produced a pseudo-scholarly fake “analysis” as a basis for a call for the government to infiltrate and neutralize the movement through activities which create “cognitive dissonance,” clearly not the least bit different from the FBI’s Cointelpro operations. But in so doing Sunstein has provided Griffin the means to demonstrate yet again that defenders of the official account of 9/11 actually cannot proceed by using reason and fact. They are forced to resort to disinformation, suppression of evidence, lies, illogic, threats and intimidation, always with the same result: failure. The more people study the events of 9/11 the more certain they become that the government and its media outlets are lying. 

Sunstein’s essay appears to reveal that the government response to its ongoing failure will be to resort to illegal activities directed against people who are speaking out about the highest crimes carried out in the corridors of power. The remarkably inept manner in which he makes his case suggests, however, that providing a rationale for such a future policy may not have been his real intention. Rather, it seems plausible that his purpose is to suggest that such actions have not even been considered before, let alone implemented, when in fact such operations have been ongoing since 9/11. 

Griffin’s COGNITIVE INFILTRATION is a lucid and compelling exposure of the contempt held by the official defenders the 9/11 myth for dissenters who have seen through their Big Lie. These officials expect that no one will be able to penetrate the murk of Sunstein’s latest defense of the pretext for the US wars of aggression in Afghanistan and Iraq, now covertly expanding into many other countries. But with David Ray Griffin’s book, everyone who is concerned with bringing their carnage and criminality to a stop, as well as to reverse the rapid erosion of civil liberties in this country, will have no difficulty remaining clear-headed in the face of the “cognitive infiltration” carried out by the holders of high office and their agents. 


10 responses to “Cognitive Infiltration: Cass Sunstein vs David Ray Griffin on 9/11 Truth

  1. right on. the truth will out

  2. When the NPR’s ‘Talk of the Nation’ host on 9-9-10 told the 9-11 widow; “that’s out of bounds of this conversation”… after a caller said only bombs could have brought down Building 7… (in violation of sec.182, 187 CPC)… I’m reminded of how co-worker Mumia was censored to further FOP corruption. Frank Renolds last words as TV anchor were that John Hinkley Sr. was a close friend of George Bush.

  3. gawd, or remember when O’Reilly screamed at the son of a man who died in the Towers, “Shut up! Shut up! Shut up!” The guy had the temerity to raise facts (that Al Qaeda was trained by the CIA).

    Guess the censors don’t want facts reaching the American public.

    Do we live in a country ruled by psychopaths, or what?

  4. truth will be out in next 20-30 years, discovery channel will be showing all conspiracies of US and its allies, like that channel frequently shows world war documentaries. But what about millions of lifes lost in american wars. Nations devastated, life became misery, wherever you walk in american invaded countries, find pain,death, suffering, screeming. Dint they had right to live peicefully in their own country.

    • The Discovery Channel? I doubt it. See link…… http://franklinscandal dot com/

      (Conspiracy of Silence was a documentary about child trafficking in the U.S. that was to be shown in the United Kingdom, but it was suppressed by the Discovery Channel. However, a rough-cut of the documentary was leaked, and it has since become an Internet phenomenon.)

  5. yeah, it gets very hard to have a conversation with anyone who gets their news only from corporate media. And if they get into judgment calls, then it’s a lost cause.

    It’s tuff being more aware than most, but at least we have each other.

  6. the 9/11 attack on America whose behind it ? ill tell you it’s the british freemasons and the british monarchy’s spy network in America. that’s who. The actual attackers were most probably were british freemasons as well.
    The usa national security has been infiltrated by the british monarchy’s spy network / british freemasons ect that’s how it was possible to accomplish the attack

  7. hybridrogue1

    the 9/11 attack on America whose behind it ? ..ill tell you it’s the british freemasons and the british monarchy’s spy network in America. that’s who. The actual attackers were most probably were british freemasons as well.
    The usa national security has been infiltrated by the british monarchy’s spy network / british freemasons ect that’s how it was possible to accomplish the attack

  8. >we won the war <
    | October 8, 2010 at 6:35 pm
    Thank you for your input, Moishe.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s