Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised)


Nov. 2013 Update: Also see Planetary Weapons and Military Weather Modification: Chemtrails, Atmospheric Geoengineering and Environmental Warfare at Global Research; and see IPCC warns policymakers not to stop ‘solar radiation management’ at Activist Post.

Sept. 2011 UPDATE: Chemtrails among Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories in 2012, featuring this article.  Buy the Book: Censored 2012.

A review of “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies”

By Rady Ananda
COTO Report

At an international symposium held in Ghent, Belgium May 28-30, 2010, scientists asserted that “manipulation of climate through modification of Cirrus clouds is neither a hoax nor a conspiracy theory.” It is “fully operational” with a solid sixty-year history. Though “hostile” environmental modification was banned by UN Convention in 1978, its “friendly” use today is being hailed as the new savior to climate change and to water and food shortages. Military forces stand poised to capitalize on controlling the world’s weather.

“In recent years there has been a decline in the support for weather modification research, and a tendency to move directly into operational projects.”

~World Meteorological Organization, 2007

Rainmaker Charles Hatfield, in 1915, destroyed much of San Diego.

The only conspiracy surrounding geoengineering is that most governments and industry refuse to publicly admit what anyone with eyes can see. Peer-reviewed research is available to anyone willing and able to maneuver the labyrinth of scientific journals. So, while there is some disclosure on the topic, full public explanation is lacking. A brief list of confirmed cloud seeding events is produced at bottom, starting in 1915.

Going under a variety of names – atmospheric geoengineering, weather modification, solar radiation management, chemical buffering, cloud seeding, weather force multiplication – toxic aerial spraying is popularly known as chemtrails. However, this is merely one technique employed to modify weather. The practice of environmental modification is vast and well funded.

Hosted by the Belfort Group, which has been working for the last seven years to raise public awareness of toxic aerial spraying, the Symposium included chemtrail awareness groups from Greece, Germany, Holland, France and the U.S.  Belfort published five videos covering only May 29,[1] when filmmaker Michael Murphy (Environmental Deception and What in the world are they spraying)[2] and aerospace engineer Dr. Coen Vermeeren [3] gave the most dramatic presentations.

Dr Vermeeren, of the Delft University of Technology, presented [4] a 300-page scientific report entitled, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies.” [5]

Case Orange notes it was prepared for the Belfort Group by a team of scientists but presented anonymously. It was sent to embassies, news organizations and interested groups around the world “to force public debate.”

The report spends some time on HAARP, the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, [6] which is a military endeavor focused on manipulation of the ionosphere, magnetosphere and atmosphere, and on other exotic weapon systems that manipulate the environment. While related, they go beyond this discussion of chemtrails.

In the interest of brevity, the health and environmental implications of cloud seeding is not discussed in any depth herein. Case Orange does go into it, as did most of the speakers at the Belfort Symposium. Cursory research reveals a debate among researchers as to chemtrail toxicity, but whether that’s a 50-50 or 99-1 argument is unknown.

Contrails Are Chemtrails

Case Orange rejects use of the term ‘chemtrails’ because it is associated with amateur conspiracy theorists. The only credible document it could find that uses it is the Space Preservation Act of 2001 introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich (D-OH). [7]  H.R. 2977 sought to ban the use of exotic weapon systems that would damage climate, weather, tectonic and biological systems. “Chemtrails” are specifically listed. Though later removed, no version of the bill ever became law.

Instead, the writers prefer the term ‘persistent contrails’ to describe the phenomenon since all contrails are chemtrails. ‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.

Case Orange also rejects misanthropic intentions behind persistent contrails on the assumptions that 1) public health agencies have the public interest at heart; and 2) the economy is consumer driven. The authors indicate no awareness of numerous reports of collusion between the pharmaceutical industry and government health agencies. This year, a significant conflict-of-interest report appeared in the prestigious British Medical Journal, which further heightened suspicions that the H1N1 flu and its vaccines were a scam.[8]  Nor do the authors consider that sick people will spur economic growth in a capitalist (for profit) health system.

Dr. Vermeeren gave his own introductory remarks and conclusions, but spent the bulk of the hour presenting information from Case Orange. He frankly admitted the existence of persistent contrails.

“We also know that chemtrails do exist because we do spraying; for crops, for example, and we know that they have been spraying for military purposes. So, chemtrails is nothing new. We know about it.”

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
LISTEN TO Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins.)  http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427

DOWNLOAD the “CASE ORANGE” Report (PDF without appendices)
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

“Weather manipulation through contrail formation … is in place and fully operational.”

Case Orange cites publicly available material that shows geoengineering has been ongoing for “at least 60 years.” Used as a weapon of war in Hamburg by the UK during World War II, it was also used in the Vietnam Conflict by the US.  Controversy over its use, revealed by investigative reporter Jack Anderson, spurred Senate hearings in 1972. During those hearings, military officials denied the use of cloud seeding technology. Later, a private letter from Secretary of Defense Melvin Laird surfaced, admitting that his testimony was false. He, again unbelievably, claimed he didn’t know what was happening. [9]

Environmental modification (EnMod) weaponry was finally banned by treaty in 1978. The UN Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques forced the end of such programs, overtly anyway.[10]  (Case Orange authors seem unaware of this international ban, as it is one of their recommendations.)

However, with widespread reporting of rising global temperatures, increasing population, and degradation of water supplies, renewed interest in EnMod is now becoming broadly supported. (See, e.g., Top economists recommend climate engineering, 4 Sep 2009 [11] and similarly, Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’, 1 Sep 2009.[12])

Project Stormfury, from 1962 to 1983, was a moderately successful program to weaken or redirect hurricanes, by flying aircraft into them and seeding the atmosphere with silver iodide and other chemicals. In the above photo, circa 1963, the belly holding the chemicals is clearly visible.

Project Stormfury, from 1962 to 1983, was a moderately successful program to weaken or redirect hurricanes, by flying aircraft into them and seeding the atmosphere with silver iodide and other chemicals. In the above photo, circa 1963, the belly holding the chemicals is clearly visible.

Building a case for old technology finding a new market, Case Orange discusses several U.S. patents. For example, authors describe a 1975 patent, “Powder Contrail Generation,” [13] for the invention of a:

“specific contrail generation apparatus for producing a powder contrail having maximum radiation scattering ability for a given weight [of] material. The seeding material … consists of 85% metallic particles and 15% colloidal Silica and Silica gel in order to produce a stable contrail that has a residence period of 1 up to 2 weeks.”

In 2009, researchers published “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” which proposed two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metallics to silica and the same staying power of one to two weeks.[14]

Case Orange also reveals a 1991 patent held by Hughes Aircraft Company [15] that:

“contains 18 claims to reduce global warming through stratospheric seeding with aluminum oxide… thorium oxide … and refractory Welsbach material ….”

The report notes that “the proposed scenario by the IPCC [Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change] in 2001 is identical to the claims” in Hughes Aircraft’s 1991 patent. Hughes was acquired by Raytheon, a private defense contractor, in 1997, “the same company that acquired E-systems and the HAARP contract.”

Case Orange presents evidence that Raytheon stands to control all weather, which the authors find repugnant given that it is a private corporation. The authors recommend suing private corporations instead of governments. But subcontracting is quite common for governments and agencies, especially the US military. The distinction between large, powerful corporations and governments is a fine line obscure to common folk. And, the effect is the same whether governments are spraying us with nano-sized metals, chemicals or biologicals, or whether corporations do. The authors’ protective posture toward governments is nonsensical.

Case Orange suggests that geoengineering found new life in the global warming scare. Old patents are being dusted off and private interests stand to make substantial sums now that Cap and Trade has been exposed as ineffective in reducing greenhouse gases. (Although, lawmakers are still considering it since much can be earned on the scheme, to wit: Al Gore reportedly achieved billionaire status from it.)

Since 2007, billionaire Bill Gates has spent at least $4.5 million on geoengineering research. [16]  Since reducing emissions is not popular with industry, ‘Plan B’ – geoengineering – is being touted as the answer to climate change and water shortage.  A longer description of Plan B is: Add more pollution to the sky and water to offset the deleterious effects of  industrial pollution, without reducing industrial pollution.

Human rights and environmental watchdog, ETC Group, describes the momentum [17]:

“The roll-out of geoengineering as Plan B is being skillfully executed: prominent high-level panels sponsored by prestigious groups, a spate of peer-reviewed articles this January in science journals, and a line-up of panicked politicians in northern countries, nodding nervously in agreement as scientists testify about the ‘need to research Plan B.’”

ETC reports that Gates’ top geoengineering advisor unveiled a plan to grow solar radiation management research “one-hundred-fold, from $10 million to $1 billion over ten years.”

Indeed, several watchdog groups recently ramped up calls to address clean water shortage. “At the end of July 2010, the United Nations General Assembly will vote on an important resolution, initiated by the Bolivian government, which would make clean water and sanitation a human right,” reports Food and Water Watch.[18]  This year, National Geographic and Yes! Magazine dedicated entire issues to water.

~~~

Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025

Case Orange ties a 1996 report by top military personnel in the U.S., “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025” [19] to evidentiary details (like governmental spraying schedules, chemical orders, correct nomenclature used in airline operating manuals, and calls for geoengineering by economists) to support its notion of “heavy involvement of governments at top level in climate control projects.”

Owning the Weather in 2025 provides a specific timeline for the use of EnMod technologies in cooperation with the Weather Modification Association (WMA), a business-government group promoting the beneficial uses of environmental modification [20]:

2000 Introduce ionic mirrors, with a sharp increase from 2008;

2000-2025 Use chemicals for atmospheric seeding by civilian (as well as military) aviation;

2004 Create smart clouds thru nanotechnology, with exponential increase after 2010;

2005 Introduce ‘carbon black dust’.

Though Case Orange decries the paucity of research into EnMod, in 2009 Weather Modification Assn. published its position statement on the safety of seeding clouds with silver-iodide, citing three dozen research papers from 1970 through 2006. [21]

In 2007, the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) published its position statement that included “Guidelines for the Planning of Weather Modification Activities.” Acknowledging that the modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, WMO asserts it is still “an emerging technology” today. [22] WMO indicated disappointment that research is being abandoned for operations.

Case Orange contains no reference to the WMA position statement citing all that research, although it cites the group. Nor does it mention the World Meteorological Organization, an agency of the United Nations, which has a link to its Weather Modification portal on its Index page.

At the end of the section, The bare necessity of geoengineering through cloud generation for survival of the planet (5.2.7), Case Orange states:

“[O]ur investigation team comes to the conclusion that climate control programs, controlled by the military but approved by governments, are silently implemented in order to avoid the worst case scenarios they obviously do not want. The two basic instruments are temperature control through generation of artificial clouds and manipulation of the ionosphere through ionosphere heaters.

“Both remain basically military combat systems with the option to go into the offensive if deemed necessary. However since several ionosphere heaters are installed on various places around the globe one can assume that there is wide cooperation between governments in order to reach the climate targets by 2025: controlling the weather and thus the planet.”

The report published the following images provided by a former meteorologist at the Ontario Weather Service, showing spraying schemes for Europe. For December 6, 2008:

In the next series of images covering January 3-5, 2010, the authors assert that “The spraying schemes seem to be organized in a logical pattern so that the whole of Europe is covered in a 3-day period”:

Case Orange agrees that climate change needs to be addressed. Regarding Climate-Gate, the authors suggest that the University of East Anglia deliberately manipulated the climate data to gradually prepare the global population for its future on a hotter planet.

They also cite research that supports the notion that climate change is real. During the three-day grounding of most aircraft after 9/11, scientists noticed an increase in temperature of 1.1 °C (2 °F). [23] This is an astounding increase in such a short time frame. The incidence of cloud seeding reports by the public increases exponentially after this.

The 1996 military piece, Owning the Weather in 2025, gives climate change skeptics “an insight in what to expect in the 21st century:

‘Current demographic, economic and environmental trends will create global stresses that provide the impetus necessary for many countries or groups to turn weather modfication ability into capability. In the United States weather modification will likely become part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. Our government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.’”

~~~

Recommendations

“Persistent contrails,” however, “have a devastating impact on eco-systems on this planet and quality of life in general.” Case Orange joins the call of Bill Gates’ geoengineering advisor and the WMO for new research measuring the impact on human health and the environment from EnMod programs.

Case Orange also recommends an immediate and full disclosure of current EnMod activities to the public; and that all civil aviation laws be abided.

Of note, in response to policy interest in geoengineering as a means to control climate change and enhance water supplies, on May 14, 2010, the science subcommittee of the United Nations Convention on Biological Diversity proposed a geoengineering moratorium. [24] This proposed ban on “friendly” EnMod programs will be heard at the Tenth Conference of Parties to UN Convention on Biodiversity in Nagoya, Japan this October.

Case Orange reports that China and Russia openly admit to cloud-seeding, while the U.S. denies such activities. The U.S. does permit open air testing of chemical and biological weapons but not under the law the authors cited, which they paraphrased:

The secretary of defense may conduct tests and experiments involving the use of chemical and biological agents on civilian populations.

Public law of the United States, Law 95-79, Title VIII, Sec. 808, July 30, 1977.

Codified as 50 USC 1520, under Chapter 32 Chemical and Biological Warfare Program, Public Law 95-79 was repealed in 1997 by Public Law 105-85. In its place, 15 USC 1520a provides restrictions (such as informed consent). 50 USC 1512, however, allows open air testing of chemicals and biologicals and allows presidential override of notices and of public health considerations for national security reasons. [25] Case Orange authors are thus correct, it seems, in asserting that such programs are legal, if reprehensible, in the U.S.

Conclusion

For centuries, military leaders have recognized that it rains after a heavy battle. But harnessing that power in a way that doesn’t cause a deluge like in San Diego in 1915 has been a task. (See Brief History, below.) The historical record has many such stories: misdirected hurricanes, farm wars, massive flooding and mudslides. Eventually, though, science met the challenge.

If its birth can be marked by Britain’s successful use of chaff in 1943 to jam enemy radar, the modern environmental modification program is 67 years old. We saw its military use in Vietnam in the 1960s. China openly used it in 2008 to clear the skies for the Olympics.

In 1978, world leaders addressed the moral and ecological issues of using such technologies as a weapon of war by banning their use.  Almost thirty years later, in 2007, the World Meteorological Organization complained that EnMod funds were moving from research into operations. Three years later, in May of this year, the United Nations proposed the ban of EnMod operations, calling for further research.

Even with a couple obvious holes in research, the Case Orange report is essentially correct: officials are spraying the skies, and they’re not fully disclosing these activities. Corporate media is colluding with officials in keeping these operations secret from the public.

But, the public has a right to know and governments have a duty to fully disclose all environmental modification operations. The impacts on our health and environment need to be fully understood, and informed consent from the populace needs to be a part of any EnMod operation.

~~~

A Brief History of Cloud Seeding

Cloud seeding, as a US military research project, began as early as the 1830s, according to Colby College professor, James R. Fleming. [26]  Verifiably successful rainmaking attempts did not occur until 1915.

1915 To end a prolonged drought, San Diego hired reputed rainmaker Charles Hatfield, who claimed that the evaporation of his secret chemical brew atop wooden towers could attract clouds.  San Diego was rewarded with a 17-day deluge that totaled 28 inches. The deadly downpour washed out more than 100 bridges, made roads impassable over a huge area, destroyed communications lines, and left thousands homeless. [27]

Charles Hatfield’s rain washes out dam 1915, San Diego. Dozens died.

1943 “The first operational use of chaff (aluminium strips which are precisely cut to a quarter of the radar’s wavelength) took place in July 1943, when [the British Royal Air Force subjected Hamburg] to a devastating bombing raid. The radar screens were cluttered with reflections from the chaff and the air defence was, in effect, completely blinded.” [28]

1946 General Electric’s Vincent Schaefer dropped six pounds of dry ice into a cold cloud over Greylock Peak in the Berkshires, causing an “explosive” growth of three miles in the cloud. [29]

New York dry ice seeding 1946 (Life Magazine)

1947 Australian meteorologists successfully repeated the process. [30]

1949 Project Cirrus: From a desert near Albuquerque, Nobel Laureate Irving Langmuir and General Electric researcher Vincent Schaefer fed ten ounces of silver iodide into a blowtorch apparatus and brought down 320 billion gallons of rain across half of New Mexico. [31]

1950 Harvard meteorologist Wallace Howell seeded New York City skies with dry ice and silver iodide smoke, filling the city’s reservoirs to near capacity. [32]

1952 The UK’s Operation Cumulus resulted in 250 times the normal amount of rainfall, killing dozens and destroying landscapes. [33]

1962-1983 Operation Stormfury, a hurricane modification program, had some success in reducing winds by up to 30%. [34]

1966-1972 Project Intermediary Compatriot (later called Pop Eye) successfully seeded clouds in Laos. The technique became part of military actions in Cambodia, Vietnam and Laos from 1967 to 1972. Initially revealed by Jack Anderson in the Washington Post, 18 Mar 1971. [35]

1986 The Soviet air force diverted Chernobyl fallout from reaching Moscow by seeding clouds. Belarus, instead, was hit with the toxic fallout. [36]

China weather rocket (2008 by ImpactLab)

2008 Chinese government used 1,104 cloud seeding missiles to remove the threat of rain ahead of the Olympic opening ceremony in Beijing. [37]

2009 Moscow Halo. Case Orange cites this as evidence of cloud seeding, but others suspect it is electromagnetic in origin. Russian authorities said it was an optical illusion. [38]

This is by no means a comprehensive list; indeed, volumes are dedicated to the subject.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Notes:

[1] Belfort Group videos of International Symposium on Chemtrails, May 29, 2010 proceedings. http://www.ustream.tv/channel/belfort-test

[2] Michael Murphy website: http://truthmediaproductions.blogspot.com/

[3] Dr Coen Vermeeren, Delft University of Technology bio, n.d. (Translated from Dutch to English by Google): http://snipurl.com/10oirj

[4] Dr Coen Vermeeren Symposium speech, Afternoon Part 1 video, (starting at about 35 mins..) (29 May 2010) http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/7299427

[5] Anonymous, “CASE ORANGE: Contrail Science, Its Impact on Climate and Weather Manipulation Programs Conducted by the United States and Its Allies,” 10 May 2010. PDF without appendices: http://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2010/07/case_orange-5-10-2010-belfort-chemtrails.pdf

[6] High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, Fact Sheet, 15 Jun 2007. http://www.haarp.alaska.edu/haarp/factSheet.html

[7] Space Preservation Act of 2001, H.R.2977, 107th Congress, 1st Session. Introduced by U.S. Representative Dennis Kucinich.

[8] Deborah Cohen and Philip Carter, “Conflicts of Interest: WHO and the pandemic ‘flu conspiracies,’” British Medical Journal 2010;340:c2912, 3 Jun 2010. http://www.bmj.com/cgi/content/full/340/jun03_4/c2912

[9] The Sunshine Project, “The Limits of Inside Pressure: The US Congress Role in ENMOD,” n.d. Accessed July 2010. http://www.sunshine-project.org/enmod/US_Congr.html

[10] United Nations, “Convention on the Prohibition of Military or Any Other Hostile Use of Environmental Modification Techniques,” Resolution 31/72, 10 Dec 1976, effective 1978. Geneva. http://www.un-documents.net/enmod.htm

[11] Copenhagen Consensus Center, “Top economists recommend climate engineering,” 4 Sep 2009. Press release [pdf] http://www.copenhagenconsensus.com/Admin/Public/DWSDownload.aspx?File=%2fFiles%2fFiler%2fPress+Releases+2010%2fCC_PRESS_STATEMENT__4september2010_.pdf

[12] Catherine Brahic, “Top science body calls for geoengineering ‘plan B’,” New Scientist, 1 Sep 2009. http://www.newscientist.com/article/dn17716-top-science-body-calls-for-geoengineering-plan-b.html

[13] Donald K. Werle, et al., “Powder contrail generation,” U.S. Patent 3,899,144, 12 Aug 1975. Assignee: U.S. Secretary of the Navy. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=3,899,144.PN.&OS=PN/3,899,144&RS=PN/3,899,144

[14] David L Mitchell and William Finnegan, “Modification of Cirrus clouds to reduce global warming,” Environmental Research Letters Vol. 4 No. 4, 30 Oct 2009. Available by subscription: http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/4/4/045102

[15] David B. Chang and I-Fu Shih, “Stratospheric Welsbach seeding for reduction of global warming,” U.S. Patent 5,003,186, 26 Mar 1991. Assignee: Hughes Aircraft Company. http://patft.uspto.gov/netacgi/nph-Parser?Sect1=PTO1&Sect2=HITOFF&d=PALL&p=1&u=%2Fnetahtml%2FPTO%2Fsrchnum.htm&r=1&f=G&l=50&s1=5,003,186.PN.&OS=PN/5,003,186&RS=PN/5,003,186

[16] Eli Kintisch, “Bill Gates Funding Geoengineering Research,” Science Insider, 26 Jan 2010. http://blogs.sciencemag.org/scienceinsider/2010/01/bill-gates-fund.html.

[17] ETC Group, “Top-down Planet Hackers Call for Bottom-up Governance: Geoengineers’ Bid to Establish Voluntary Testing Regime Must Be Opposed,” 11 Feb 2010. http://www.etcgroup.org/en/node/5073

[18] Food and Water Watch: http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/water/world-water/right/

[19] Col Tamzy J. House, et al. “Weather as a Force Multiplier: Owning the Weather in 2025,” Department of Defense U.S. Air Force, 17 Jun 1996. Publicly released August 1996. Reproduced at Federation of American Scientists: http://www.fas.org/spp/military/docops/usaf/2025/v3c15/v3c15-1.htm

[20] Weather Modicaton Association website: http://www.weathermodification.org/

[21] Weather Modification Association, “Position Statement on the Environmental Impact of Using Silver Iodides as a Cloud Seeding Agent,” July 2009. http://www.weathermodification.org/AGI_toxicity.pdf

[22] World Meteorological Organization, “WMO Statement on Weather Modification,” UN Commission for Atmospheric Sciences Management Group, 26 Sep 2007. http://www.wmo.int/pages/prog/arep/wwrp/new/documents/WM_statement_guidelines_approved.pdf

[23] Donald J. Travis, et al. “Contrails reduce daily temperature range,” Nature 418, 601, 8 Aug 2002. Reproduced by University of Washington, Dept. of Atmospheric Sciences: http://www.atmos.washington.edu/~rennert/etc/courses/pcc587/ref/Travis-etal2002_Nature.pdf

[24] Subsidiary Body on Scientific, Technical and Technological Advice, “In-depth Review of the Work on Biodiversity and Climate Change, Draft Recommendation,” Convention on Biological Diversity, United Nations Environmental Programme, UNEP/CBD/SBTTA/14/L.9, 15 May 2010. http://www.cbd.int/doc/meetings/sbstta/sbstta-14/in-session/sbstta-14-L-09-en.pdf

[25] United States Code, Title 50, Chapter 32, “Chemical and Biological Warfare Program.” http://uscode.house.gov/download/pls/50C32.txt

[26] James Rodger Fleming, “The pathological history of weather and climate modification: Three cycles of promise and hype,” Historical Studies in the Physical and Biological Sciences, Vol. 37, No. 1, 2006. Available at http://www.colby.edu/sts/06_fleming_pathological.pdf

[27] Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml

[28] Monsignore Pizzafunghi Bosselese, “The History of Radar,” BBC, 14 Jul 2003. http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/h2g2/A591545

[29] Fleming, citing New York Times, 15 Nov 1946, 24.

[30] Squires, P. & Smith, E. J., “The Artificial Stimulation of Precipitation by Means of Dry Ice,” Australian Journal of Scientific Research, Series A: Physical Sciences, vol. 2, p.232, 1949AuSRA…2..232S, 1949. Republished at Harvard University: http://articles.adsabs.harvard.edu//full/1949AuSRA…2..232S/0000244.000.html

Also see: Stephen Cole, “Weather on Demand,” American Heritage, 2005. http://www.americanheritage.com/articles/magazine/it/2005/2/2005_2_48.shtml

[31]  Life Magazine, “Solution to Water Shortage: Rain makers’ success shows how New York could fill its reservoirs,” p. 113, 20 Feb 1950. http://snipurl.com/10oir8

[32] Life Magazine, “U.S. Water: We can supplement our outgrown sources at a price,” 21 Aug 1950, p. 52. http://snipurl.com/10oirc

[33] John Vidal and Helen Weinstein, “RAF rainmakers ’caused 1952 flood': Unearthed documents suggest experiment triggered torrent that killed 35 in Devon disaster,” The Guardian, 30 Aug 2001. http://www.guardian.co.uk/silly/story/0,10821,544259,00.html

Also see: BBC News, “Rain-making link to killer floods,” 30 Aug 2001. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/1516880.stm

[34] Jerry E. Smith, “Weather Warfare: The Military’s Plan to Draft Mother Nature,” Adventures Unlimited Press, 2006. pp. 47-54. http://snipurl.com/10oiqw

[35] ibid. pp. 54-60.

[36] Richard Gray, “How we made the Chernobyl rain,” Daily Telegraph, 22 Apr 2007. http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/1549366/How-we-made-the-Chernobyl-rain.html

[37] Ian O’Neill, “The Chinese ‘Weather Manipulation Missile’ Olympics,” Universe Today, 12 Aug 2008. http://www.universetoday.com/2008/08/12/the-chinese-weather-manipulation-missile-olympics/

[38] Anonymous, “Moscow Halo,” cell phone video uploaded to YouTube, 7 Oct 2009. reposted at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FXF9HSB627U

.

~~~
An earlier version of this report was published at Global Research.  Above is the revised version.

~~~

About these ads

172 responses to “Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised)

  1. Great article – thank you.

    There have been many folks who call us names for talking about “jet trails” or “chemtrails”

    then again, we are also criticized for speaking out concerning issues such as 9/11 Truth.

    “The key to growth is the introduction of higher dimensions of consciousness into our awareness” – Lao Tzu

  2. A great article indeed Rady. Quite informative for those beginning to learn about the Chemtrails and the nefarious geoengineering, which [they] are doing to our Earth.

    Is it to protect this tiny blue sphere from a Solar Flare “Mass Coronal Ejection?”

    If [they] truly cared about “us” why would [they] be spraying the upper atmosphere with toxins i.e. barium and aluminum etc. and not tell “us?”

    What I find most troubling are the polymer fibers that fall to the ground. Next time you’re outside during the late afternoon, find a grassy area and looking toward the West bend down and then look at the Sun shining along the ground and you’ll see these fibers. They’re all over. At first I thought they were merely spider webs, but not an entire field.

    If you have a fence you’ll see these fibers there too. Again, they are every where. They’re even inside our homes. That’s a fact. God only knows the consistency of these fibers. Nano?

    • thx, munich — once I found governmental and academic sources, I almost changed the entire theme of the article. But, thru psyops, most folks still think it’s a conspiracy, so I decided to stick with refuting that idea.

      as to the polymer fibers, I just checked (3 pm) the yard and dont’ see anything; will check in a couple hours.

      and yeah, the subject is HUGE – and the idea of magnetic resonance as a way to control us, omg… I want to go down that rabbit hole; how fascinating and frightening.

    • hey, munich — I just read a great acronym for THEY:

      The Hierarchy Enslaving You

  3. I’m glad you have brought your skills to this area Rady.

    Living in Florida you and I have been spared the chemtrailing volume of other areas. I remember when in 1990, I got the word on Scalar / Challenger I put the EM technology together with the strange reports of chemtrailing that was happening elsewhere.

    The treaty 31/72 was adopted in 1976 and here is the document on COTO website.

    http://www.coalitionoftheobvious.com/3436120-UN-1976-Weather-Weapon-Treaty.pdf

    Now the traid of EnMod, WMD, and Blue Beam are connected. Please see my next article as it will tie the entire scheme together.

    • thx, Patrick – they’re spraying quite often here (now that I finally discern what it is. :)

      btw, see FN 10. but good to have on your site as a handy reference

      just checked out blue beam — interesting. Looking forward to your next article.

  4. as ever Rady, well done!
    I also didnt believe it till I also niticed the odd, odd:-) trail here downunder also.
    Conspiracy? yes I believe it fits that descriptor, it IS a collusion of a few, to deny info and truth to the masses.
    The weird thing that seems to have been missed?
    is that while it covers the sky, not all cause rain, thereby the fake cloud KEEPS the HEAT IN, under them, thereby CREATING the warming they say…they are trying to stop, a clear cloudless night will frost, one with cloud cover will not. clouds cover = warmer!
    tropical areas are warmer in part DUE TO the cloud moisture holding the warmth in. oif clouds reflected the light than the tropical areas with massive cumulus clouds often would be cooler, they sure arent.
    And they sure are NOT creating rain in most instances as evidenced by drought in Cali, and elsewhere, again using warming as a reason for this lack, of rain,
    then I find its is a mental twister to justify seeding with non rain producing toxic crap like aluminium and barium, when water is so needed.
    Africa has been dying for the lack yet they cant arrange some rain?
    when they have the power to do so..
    nah it is NOT for any earth saving purpose, its to keep the warming Fraud going.
    Pity for them?( I Have NONE!!) the world does what it does regardless and has been cooling since 2000 despite their best efforts:-)
    May they all ROT!

    • thx for the kudos, Oz.

      You’re absolutely correct that EnMod can dry out the skies (which is why China used it in 2008 prior to the opening ceremony of the Olympics). But it can also cause rain. It depends on which chemicals (or nanosized metals) are used.

      One explanation for allowing regions to remain arid may be as a way to force indigenous people off the land. Governments and multinational corporations are scooping up land in Africa and elsewhere right now in what has been called the largest land grab in the history of humanity.

      As to whether or not the globe is truly warming up, I’m keeping an open mind on this. I tend to believe it is happening, and I base that on the following:

      1. 150 years of industrial pollutants that increase the greenhouse effect.

      2. 400 years of massive deforestation. Forests cool the planet, create moisture in the air and fix carbon from the atmosphere. In fact, ahead of the 1996 Olympics, Atlanta planted 2,000 trees which cooled the city 10 degrees F.

      3. Conversion of mass tracts of prairie and wetlands into concrete and asphalt (development).

      4. Growing desertification, as a result of #2 and #3.

      Even with the IPCC lying about temperatures, industrial activity can be blamed for warming mass areas.

      so, we’ll just agree to disagree about AGW.

      but I love ya, just the same

      8)

  5. The “geoengineers” pushing for aerosol spraying while denying the existence of ongoing operations right NOW, are criminals against humanity. Caldeira and Keith will eventually find themselves at the end of the tolerance the people already have for our “leaders” who have led us to the edge of the cliff.

    Both these men stand to make huge fortunes ripping off the world. Join the pack….Tony Hayward, Maddoff, Caldeira, Keith, Gates…..

    They are the curses of humanity.

  6. Look up into the sky and see the Geo-enginnering in works everyday. The Sky Priate line up of indivduals starting with Dr Alan Robock the bigggest Liar of disinfo. Stating we do not have the ability to deploy Aerosols. David keith and Ken Calderia are next on the list of Pirate presentors of this very in depth deception.
    All I can say is what happened to Pirates back in the Day when they Got Caught? Hang them from the Yard Arms.

  7. Bravo, sister. Excellente’ !

  8. this was so cool. I thought I’d repost the comment on the appropriate article.

    Eduardo, on August 3, 2010 at 9:48 am Said:

    It needs to be known throughout the world Rady, thanks for such wonderful article. We will stop those who want to destroy us and our world.

    http://www.globalresearch.ca/index.php?context=va&aid=20369

    The paper sent me a contributor to this humble blog, Mercedes, along with the full orange report, accompany it with the link of the video of the conference is very good, you’ve culled the most important thing of it, and the contribution you have made to Rady commendable society.

    Eduardo

    Reply :

    Rady, on August 3, 2010 at 11:16 pm Said:

    methinks you meant to put this comment on Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails.

    thank you again for your translation into Spanish at your blog: http://escuadrondelaverdad.wordpress.com/2010/08/02/geoingenieria-atmosferica-la-manipulacion-del-clima-estelas-y-chemtrails/

  9. Good read. Acknowledging that the modern technology of weather modification began in the 1940s, WMO asserts it is still “an emerging technology”

  10. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) « COTO Report

  11. Pingback: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) : Infowars Ireland

  12. Pingback: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) : Infowars Ireland

  13. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky :

  14. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky | Dark Politricks

  15. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky « Climate Connections

  16. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky | Northland New Zealand Chemtrails Watch

  17. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky | USAHitman | Conspiracy News

  18. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky : Infowars Ireland

  19. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky : NOVAKEO.COM – The Radically Alternative Webzine

  20. Pingback: Die Party ist vorbei! - yoice.net

  21. great article: see the site strangedaysstrangeskies and rense if you have any questions. barium blues has a bit to say on the topic also. blessings pam

  22. thx, Pam. Love Rense.

    there are multiples sites using that term, strangedaysstrangeskies – don’t know which is the actual site.

  23. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky | War On You: Breaking Alternative News

  24. Pingback: FORESTE, OCEANI E CIELI ALIENI:FORESTE GENETICAMENTE MODIFICATE, CHE ALTERANO LA CHIMICA DELL’ATMOSFERA E DELL’IDROSFERA -

  25. Pingback: Oltre la Coltre » FORESTE, OCEANI E CIELI ALIENI: Ecologia FORESTE GENETICAMENTE MODIFICATE, CHE ALTERANO LA CHIMICA DELL’ATMOSFERA E DELL’IDROSFERA

  26. Pingback: FORESTE, OCEANI E CIELI ALIENI | Informare per Resistere

  27. I read the Case Orange. It is well documented. I suggest you transfer this report to all your contacts in order to force ‘them’ to make it public. With love from Germany.

  28. Pingback: Water Use in Southwest Heads for a Day of Reckoning - Politics and Other Controversies -Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 2 - City-Data Forum

  29. Pingback: Atlanta to premier What in the World Are they Spraying? 10/23 | COTO Report

  30. Pingback: Chemtrails – dowody zbrodni przeciwko naszemu narodowi « Poliszynel's Blog

  31. fuck bill gates

    whats great is that these assholes all breathe the same air as us. fucking morons, time is running out for you fucking excuses for humans. spit in gods face? you will feel his wrath.

  32. I’ve just learned all about this stuff. Never knew, and now I’m freaked out! Here in NH, I’ve watched the last 2 days they’ve been here over my house! I can’t believe what I’m seeing………………so NOT GOOD!
    I feel sorry for the children……..this world is doomed. Great article, thank you so much for enlightening us!

  33. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky | NW0.eu

  34. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | COTO Report

  35. Pingback: Confronting the ‘futuristic’ branding of geoengineering | COTO Report

  36. Pingback: How Pasterized Milk and Food, MeatGate, CowGate, ClimateGate | Journal of Living Food and Healing

  37. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | COTO Report

  38. Pingback: COP16: Climate Change Concern Morphs Into Chemtrail Glee Club « The Tonka Report

  39. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | Old-Thinker News

  40. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club « Anti Oligarch

  41. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | uticafreepress.com

  42. Pingback: News From Around The World In True Form

  43. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | NORTHLAND NEW ZEALAND CHEMTRAILS WATCH

  44. Pingback: “U.N. Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club” : Infowars Ireland

  45. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club «

  46. Pingback: The Truth Or The Fight » Blog Archive » UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club

  47. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club | GEO-ENGINEERING WATCH INTERNATIONAL

  48. Pingback: Free Paradigm » Blog Archive » UN Climate Concern Morphs into Chemtrail Glee Club – Rady Ananda

  49. Pingback: UN Climate Concern Turns into Chemtrail Support | Truth Is Scary

  50. Pingback: Constitutional Law Research and Analysis of Forced Vaccination During Declaration of Martial Law, War, Outbreak or Pandemic | COTO Report

  51. Pingback: Chemtrails...reality or BS? - Politics and Other Controversies -Democrats, Republicans, Libertarians, Conservatives, Liberals, Third Parties, Left-Wing, Right-Wing, Congress, President - Page 11 - City-Data Forum

  52. You identified a couple of omissions. Good. An additional one is the class of contrails that form across the entire main wing called aerodynamic contrails. (see Aerodynamic Contrails: Microphysics and Optical Properties )
    This type of contrail features a lot in the “chemtrail evidence” in the Internet. (see “The insider: chemtrails KC-10″ )

    “Case Orange” also contains some inaccuracies: In section 2.1 Contrails, it says of the WW11 contrails, “A very important feature is that these early contrails are short lived.” This is not correct; some were very persistent. It goes on, “However modern jet aircraft with powerful engines and high turbine temperatures emit more persistent contrails, which usually ‘trail’ for 20-30 miles along.” I seriously doubt that this is a true statement, and is contradicted later in the report by a false conclusion!

    Fortunately, the document fully redeems itself in section 4.1.3 Development of contrails into Cirrus clouds:” At the bottom of page 27 and top of 28 it says, “If liquid H2O saturation is reached in the plume, a contrail forms. Ice particles are created in the contrail mainly by freezing of exhaust particles. Scavenging of exhaust particles and further deposition of H2O leads to an increase of the ice mass. The contrail persists in ice-supersaturated air and may develop into a cirrus cloud. Short-lived and persistent contrails return residual particles into the atmosphere upon evaporation.”
    However, the authors completely miss the importance of this, and instead use it to draw a false conclusion about fuel types and persistent contrails, and contradicts the earlier statement about modern jet engines!

    That paragraph (and the previous one) has been lifted, word for word, from the caption to a diagram in an IPCC report: Aviation and the Global Atmosphere, 3.2. Aerosol Emission and Formation in Aircraft Plumes, Figure 3-1. The diagram is not in the “Case Orange” report, and the lifted paragraphs are not attributed to the source despite extensive references to other publications.

    Here are the important parts again: “If liquid H2O saturation is reached in the plume, a contrail forms. … The contrail persists in ice-supersaturated air and may develop into a cirrus cloud.”
    Basically, the persistent trails are ‘normal’ contrails that have formed in ice-supersaturated air.

    Wait a minute! This is in direct contradiction to your assertion that “normal aircraft exhaust [...] dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.” And this same assertion is the false premise upon which the whole “chemtrail” scare is built… isn’t it?

  53. Pingback: Sinister secrets in the sky and Morgellons disease | COTO Report

  54. Pingback: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) | John Galt's Blog

  55. The article on this site says the following:

    “‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes. ”

    This is patently, irrefutably, undeniably false….

    …and thus all the conclusions based on this false premise are rendered null.

    • show us the patent, or the citation that refutes this

      besides, this article is a review of a scientific report. The sentence you pulled out is their definition, for the sake of the discussion.

  56. Ross Marsden

    No, that sentence is all your words. The “Case Orange” report does not define “persistent contrails” in that or in any way. All through the body of the report the unqualified term “contrails” is used. There is no effort to distinguish ephemeral contrails from those that persist.

    I have quoted and referenced a refutation of your statement. See my comment above dated 11 January 2011. You will find the same sentence in the “Case Orange” report!

    Quite ironic really.

    • what can I say, Ross? you obviously have not read Case Orange.

      • What can you say? You can say the page number of Case Orange where they give that definition.

        I have read Case Orange. Obviously, you have not.

        • Did you forget to read page 1 of the Executive Summary?

          the only quote I give regarding the definition is the term “persistent contrails”. I qualify this based on the explanation provided by Dr Vermeeren at the conference. You’ll have to watch the video.

  57. Rady said:

    “show us the patent, or the citation that refutes this”

    That “normal” contrails often persist, spread and cover the sky in a haze has been observed, studied, irrefutably proven by empirical science and indeed simple atmospheric physics for decades- such as this paper from 1972:

    Measurements of the Growth of the Ice Budget in a Persisting Contrail
    R.G. Knollenberg
    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    Volume 29, Issue 7 (October 1972)

    quote:

    “It is often observed that contrails spread considerably…Under favorable conditions, a lateral spread of kilometers is observed…If sufficient air traffic exists, and entire overcast of contrail cirrus may develop and persist for hours with rapid growth in the ice budget of individual contrails.”

    There are literally 100s more papers- written by scientists- peer-reviewed and based on the laws of physics and empirical observation- from around the World over the last 40yrs- detailing that which you claim is not possible…detailing that the very premise that the “chemtrail” theory is based on- “contrails dissipate- chemtrails don’t- is irrefutably false.

    Want more? Here is another

    Airborne Observations of Contrail Effects on the Thermal Radiation Budget
    Peter M. Kuhn
    Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences
    Volume 27, Issue 6 (September 1970)

    Quote:

    “The spreading of jet contrails into extensive cirrus sheets is a familiar sight. Often, when persistent contrails exist from 25,000 to 40,000 ft, several long contrails increase in number and gradually merge into an almost solid interlaced sheet.”

    Indeed- even “Case Orange” states that “normal” contrails can persist and spread.

    They very premise of the “chemtrail” theory – that “contrails dissipate-chemtrails don’t” is false…

    Draw your own conclusions from there.

  58. chemtrails dissipate much more slowly. no one said they persist forever

    “‘Persistent contrails’ distinguishes those that contain weather-altering additives from those that represent normal aircraft exhaust that dissipates after a few seconds or minutes.”

  59. Rady said-

    “chemtrails dissipate much more slowly.”

    More slowly than what??

    Did you not read the papers I quoted? or the 100s of others written over the last 60yrs? Persistent contrails FROM NORMAL AIRCRAFT EXHAUST can persist for hours- they have even been tracked for days on satellite…they can spread, merge and cover the sky in a haze…

    This fact is even clearly spelled out in case orange…

    This is EXACTLY what supposedly differentiates “chemtrails” from contrails….and yet its not true.

    People see a short contrail- an ephemeral contrail- dissipating seconds after its formation…then they see a long, persistent contrail that does not dissipate but lingers across the sky…they claim it is a “chemtrail” because they were told that contrails can’t do that…

    This is patently, irrefutably, undeniably false….

    …and thus the entire theory is based on a false premise.

    That people crop dust, or that they shoot ice flares of silver iodide into rain clouds and have for decades (its not secret and doesn’t involve a trail of any sort) or they sprayed agent orange in Vitenam, or they use chaff to confuse radar (again- not secret, doesn’t involve a contrail- released in small batched via flares) , the military would love to “Own the Weather” and on and on….

    …None of that means that if you see a contrail persist and spread it is a “chemtrail”.

    The physics of the atmopshere doesn’t lie…it isn’t “disinfo”. Normal contrails from normal air traffic often do persist for hours and spread…so seeing one do so CANNOT be construed to be a “chemtrail” simply because you read it on the internet and don’t trust the government.

  60. Weeks? really? Can you explicitly verify that? Or do you just want it to be so? Have you really sampled the trail in question, determined the contents and then diligently followed those contents as they drifted with the jet stream and upper winds for weeks??

    The trail that supposedly lasts for “weeks” mentioned in your article is the powder contrail generator that was designed to aid in the visual acquisition of an aircraft- the term “contrail” was used- literally-for a lack of a better term. The dispersal of this powder trail was to take place from a pod on the belly of the plane. How many “chemtrails” have you seen emanate from a pod on the belly of an aircraft? (Hint- if there is a gap between the trail and the engine- that is the time it takes for water vapor to condense and freeze…)

    Of course, in the actual patent application there is no mention of the powder trail lasting for weeks:

    Nor is that level of persistence associated with the vast majority of “chemtrail” claims….but whatever.

    Are you really suggesting that “chemtrails” people think they see are really powder contrails dispersed from a pod on the belly of a plane?

    Also- I have to mention this- the images from the “Ontario Weather Service” you (and case orange) included were created by Kevin Martin- he is a well known hoaxer who created a “chemtrail” forecast whereby he simply took a water vapor map provided by NOAA and “forecasted” “chemtrails” wherever it was clear the upper air humidity levels would support persistent contrails generated by “normal” air traffic. That case orange decided to include that “information” is a severe indictment on their due diligence…as for you – you were merely reguritating that which you wanted to hear…

    Look you just do not seem to understand.

    People see a persistent trail in the sky and claim with a shrill cry that it is a “chemtrail”. When in fact, given the historical precedent of normal jet exhaust’s behavior in the atmosphere, given the scientific realities of water vapor expelled into super cold, humid air…it is HIGHLY likely that all they are seeing is a quite normal, long understood result of “normal” jet traffic.

    I am sure you do it…you see a long white trail in the sky, shake your fist and say “damn those spray planes” – then run home to your computer and think you can “google” yourself to the truth- one more youtube video and you are almost there….then expel your vitriol and bitterness for all to see…anyone who has more power than you is evil….

    I do not doubt your sincerity and concern….but you mustn’t let emotions cloud your ability to think logically- Thinking “I don’t remember long persistent trails in the sky before- it must be a global, clandestine “spray” campaign”…..all the while forgetting to relax and look at the basic truths, the realities of physics, the nature of the atmosphere, the historical precedent of air travel…

    PS: as for Sorcha Faal…simply not a credible source of info:
    See for yourself:

    http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index632.htm

  61. “Weeks? really? Can you explicitly verify that?”

    read my article, that source is cited.

    and who the hell is talking about sorcha faal?

  62. Pingback: Chemtrails – dowody zbrodni przeciwko ludziom. « polonuska

  63. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky « A Truth Soldier

  64. Pingback: Alien Forest, Alien Ocean, Alien Sky « Daniel J Towsey A Truth Soldier

  65. Pingback: CHEMTRAILS

  66. Pingback: CHEMTRAILS « Portugal Esotérico.org

  67. Pingback: Diferença entre Contrails e Chemtrails

  68. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Donate to Rady Ananda of COTO Report and Food Freedom

  69. Pingback: Lima Peru June 20-22nd 2011 IPCC on Geoengineering | JustMEinT's General Blog

  70. Pingback: Beyond Protest: Saving our planet with ‘Deep Green Resistance’ | COTO Report

  71. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | COTO Report

  72. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | BLOGSPOT TEMPLATES

  73. Pingback: 10 Censored Stories » Dystopia Earth

  74. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories : Veracity Voice – Independent Media for the Independent Mind

  75. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | ADSENSE OPTIMIZED TEMPLATES

  76. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | Dark Politricks

  77. Pingback: Chemtrail Article In Project Censored’s Top 10 Most Censored Stories :

  78. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | Independent News Hub

  79. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories

  80. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | Food Freedom

  81. Pingback: chemtrail e a censura | A Arte da Omissao

  82. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories | Victors Post

  83. Pingback: What the hell are they spraying on us? PART 8 « Foundingfather1776

  84. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) | COTO Report

  85. Pingback: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails | Pacific Progress

  86. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories » The Original N-D-N's Blog

  87. Pingback: Abnormal and persisting jet trail : Are Commercial Airlines Spraying in our Skies ? | canadanewslibre

  88. Pingback: Top 10 Most Censored Stories of 2011 | USAHM Conspiracy News

  89. Pingback: Are you prepared? | A CROOKED PATH

  90. Pingback: Un articulo sobre "chemtrails" llega al top 10 de la lista de Proyecto Censurado - Nuevo Orden

  91. Jeez, they laid a thick X over my house yesterday

    • Fascinating! Is it still there today? Will it be there next week?
      About this “Chemtrails can last for weeks, as reported in my article.” statement, and that you cite a source for it.
      You quoted part of a claim in a patent exposition, what is not the same as a documented instance of an actual chemtrail lasting for weeks. Then you linked that “last for weeks” claim to a research paper where you say they “proposed two methods of delivery for this same proportion of metallics to silica”. Actually the research paper does not mention “metallics” or “silica” at all.
      The article says ( section 2.2), “The objective would not be to seed
      specific cloud systems but rather to build up a background
      concentration of aerosol seeding material so that the air masses
      that cirrus will form in will contain the appropriate amount
      of seeding material to produce larger ice crystals.” The piece goes on “… residence time of seeding material might be on the order of 1–2 weeks … “.
      This is quite different to saying that chemtrails last for weeks. They say the objective to not to make trails at all but to build up a background of the stuff.
      You have misunderstood the article, and you are using your misunderstanding to make extraordinary claims.

      • Report: “residence time of seeding material might be on the order of 1–2 weeks”

        you: “This is quite different to saying that chemtrails last for weeks.”

        No it’s not.

  92. also see Why in the World Are They Spraying? by Michael J. Murphy

    http://foodfreedom.wordpress.com/2011/10/12/why-in-the-world-are-they-spraying/

    which indicates that not only are these chemicals persisting in the atmosphere, but they’re heating it up, too.

  93. Pingback: 60 Year History of Geoengineering

  94. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories - TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg

  95. Pingback: Топ-10 самых цензурируемых в США историй | bezprikras.us

  96. Pingback: Suffolk Co. NY to hear proposal to ban chemtrails | COTO Report

  97. Pingback: Top 10 Most Censored Stories of 2011 | Lightfoot Osolage, Author

  98. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels « Abact Services

  99. Pingback: FDA Sued Over Lack of Nanotech Labels :

  100. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels | News & Current Events

  101. Pingback: FDA Sued Over Lack of Nanotech Labels

  102. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels | COTO Report

  103. Pingback: FDA Sued Over Lack of Nanotech Oversight, Labels : Veracity Voice

  104. Pingback: 10 labiausiai cenzūruojamų Amerikoje temų | versijos

  105. Pingback: Chemtrails – dowody zbrodni | jankarol75

  106. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows « Abact Services

  107. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows | TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg

  108. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows | TruthTheory

  109. Pingback: Confessions of a Lukewarmist | TaJnB | TheAverageJoeNewsBlogg

  110. Pingback: Confessions of a Lukewarmist | TruthTheory

  111. Pingback: Confessions of a Lukewarmist : Veracity Voice

  112. Pingback: Suffolk Co. NY to hear proposal to ban chemtrails – modrstudio

  113. Pingback: Confessions of a Lukewarmist

  114. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels

  115. Pingback: Suffolk Co. NY to hear proposal to ban chemtrails

  116. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows « Food Freedom

  117. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels « Food Freedom

  118. Pingback: Chemtrails vs Contrails « Contra-Educação

  119. Pingback: Chemtrails em Portugal « Contra-Educação

  120. Pingback: O que são Chemtrails? (Solução ao Aquecimento Global?!) « Contra-Educação

  121. Pingback: Owning the Weather « ipollnews

  122. Pingback: older news | GeoengineeringWatch.org

  123. Pingback: Older Articles | GeoengineeringWatch.org

  124. Pingback: New Orleans InfoWars video entry: Chemtrails, GMOs & Transgenics

  125. Pingback: Chemtrails, GMOs & Transgenics: Infowars Reporter Contest

  126. Pingback: Raphaelle O’Neil on the Infowars Reporter Contest: Chemtrails, GMOs & Transgenics | Victorious News

  127. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Activist Post: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories

  128. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) | COTO Report

  129. Pingback: Chemtrails, GMOs & Transgenics [video] « PN

  130. Pingback: CHEM TRAILS -2- | soledadmorena

  131. Pingback: Food Freedom News » SPECIAL REPORT: Constitutional Law Research and Analysis of Forced Vaccination During Declaration of Martial Law, War, Outbreak or Pandemic

  132. Pingback: Carbon Black Chemtrails – VIDEOS « Chemtrails In Our Skies

  133. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Marge Simpson Talks About Chemtrails and Transhumanism

  134. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories

  135. Pingback: The Progressive Mind » Marge Simpson Talks About Chemtrails and Transhumanism | Food Freedom News

  136. Pingback: Top 10 nejvíce cenzurovaných příběhů v USA | Kdoví?

  137. Pingback: What the hell are they spraying on us? » What the hell are they spraying on us? | GeoengineeringWatch.org

  138. Pingback: Top 10 Most Censored Stories of 2011 |

  139. Pingback: Top 10 Most Censored Stories of 2011 | tumblr backups

  140. Pingback: CHEMTRAILS: Globalni zločin - Stranica 360 - Alternativa Forum

  141. Pingback: NOLA InfoWars entry: Chemtrails, GMOs & Transgenics | Abact Services

  142. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Neurologist: Your Brain on Chemtrails

  143. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows - Infowars Ireland

  144. Pingback: FDA sued over lack of Nanotech oversight, labels - Infowars Ireland

  145. Pingback: Chemtrail article in Project Censored’s Top 10 most censored stories - Infowars Ireland

  146. Pingback: PIPA vote stalled while US censorship still grows | COTO Report

  147. Pingback: Confessions of a Lukewarmist | COTO Report

  148. Pingback: Atmospheric Geoengineering: Weather Manipulation, Contrails and Chemtrails (Revised) | COTO Report

  149. Pingback: CHEMTRAILS

  150. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Atlanta to premier What in the World Are they Spraying? 10/23

  151. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Shelter Food Freedom News and help launch the Food Freedom Farm

  152. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Air Force whistleblower speaks on chemtrails

  153. Pingback: Water Liberty: How Innovation Trumps Privatization | COTO Report

  154. Pingback: Food Freedom News » Water Liberty: How Innovation Trumps Privatization

  155. Pingback: Rady Ananda ~ Water Liberty: How Innovation Trumps Privatization | Shift Frequency

  156. Pingback: Beyond Protest: Saving our Planet with ‘Deep Green Resistance’ | Pilataanko Suomessakin tarkoituksellisesti Suomen ilmasto ja maaperä? Tutki nyt asiaa avoimin mielin.